International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Karasik V. I. Genres of Network Discourse. Speech Genres, 2019, no. 1(21), pp. 49-55. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2019-1-21-49-55

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 949)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
81’38’48:004.738
EDN: 
YZSZFZ

Genres of Network Discourse

Autors: 
Karasik Vladimir Ilyich, Pushkin State Russian language Institute
Abstract: 

The paper deals with genre characteristics of network discourse treated as communication in social networks. Constitutive features of this communication include (1) a communicative community of people who share mutual interests and have access to a common electronic resource, (2) multimodal semiotic nature of messages having visual, audial and textual components, (3) opportunity of immediate responses to any message, (4) a short communicative distance with merging of public and private formats of interaction. The genre system of this discourse type is very flexible, it consists of personal and institutional communicative elements and includes both distinct and diffuse genre entities. The material analyzed makes it possible to specify 8 genre types within network discourse on the basis of a key intention of communication: 1) demonstratives (self-presentations, such as selfies), 2) reportatives (important news, usually reposted), 3) sociatives (notes about interesting things or events, usually connecting people as a topical group), 4) creative (pieces of creative art, original or reposted), 5) agitatives (messages promoting some goods or way of life), 6) instructives (recommendations for solving concrete problems), 7) prescriptives (wise observations, usually with moral implications), 8) attractives (entertaining jocular messages).

Reference: 
  1. Austin J. Slovo kak deystvie [Word as action]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986, iss. 17, pp. 22–129 (in Russian).
  2. Barnes J. A. Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish. Human Relations, 1954, no. 7, pp. 39–58.
  3. Hall E. T. The Hidden Dimension. New York, Anchor, 1969. 217 p.
  4. McLuhan M. Ponimaniye Media : Vneshniye rasshireniya cheloveka [Understanding Media : External Human Extensions]. Moscow, Zhukovskiy, Kanon-Press-TS, Kuchkovo pole Publ., 2003. 464 p. (in Russian).
  5. Novikova E. Yu. Mezhdunarodnyy turisticheskiy diskurs kak lingvokul’turnyy transfer [International tourist discourse as a linguistic-cultural transfer]. Volgograd, Izd-vo VolGU, 2017. 332 p. (in Russian).
  6. Romanov A. A. Sistemnyy analiz regulyativnykh sredstv dialogicheskogo obshcheniya [System analysis of regulatory means of dialogic communication]. Moscow, In-t yazykoznaniya AN SSSR, 1988. 183 p. (in Russian).
  7. Searle J. Chto takoe rechevoy akt? [What is a speech act?]. Novoe v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1986, iss. 17, pp. 151–169 (in Russian).
Received: 
15.08.2018
Accepted: 
20.10.2018
Published: 
28.02.2019