International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Khalikov M. M. Cognitive-operational and speech-genre universalism of the oxymoron. Speech Genres, 2024, vol. 19, iss. 3 (43), pp. 237-246. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2024-19-3-43-237-246, EDN: JDTWPN

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 192)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
811.161.1’37’38
EDN: 
JDTWPN

Cognitive-operational and speech-genre universalism of the oxymoron

Autors: 
Khalikov Magomed Magomedovich, Samara State Transport University
Abstract: 

The article attempts to explicate the stylistic figure of the oxymoron as a phenomenon that shows the representation in the sphere of language of a specific property of human consciousness and the picture of the world structured by it – the presumption of the unsubstantial nature of opposites and the possibility, on this basis, of their discursive actualization in the formulas of semantic synthesis. It is shown that the contact arrangement of coreferent antonyms in a single syntagmatic construction is not enough to form an oxymoron (black-and-white movie). This figure of speech arises as a result of the presence of the subject of speech and their evaluative-characterizing intention in the semantic space of the text (sad-happy eyes). Evaluation individualizes the mode of reception and the resulting picture of the world. Thus, the oxymoron comes into play as a way of organizing the cognitive model of non-linguistic reality, as an individual experience of perceiving and semantizing objects and phenomena. On the basis of representative communicative and speech material, the author demonstrates the universal nature of the application and actualization of the oxymoron in the entire range of the main socially relevant types of discourse. It is important to note that each speechgenre area differs in its specificity in the interpretation of the text-forming and pragmatic potential of the oxymoron. In poetry, it can act as a structural-compositional model of the whole work, totally determining the possibility of the appearance and functionality of all other elements of the text. In official business discourse, the oxymoron is present implicitly, as an unarticulated and fundamentally rejected pragmatic antithesis to the technique of textual construction, focused on the exclusive and only relevance of denotative semantics for the organization of the message. The author believes that the constructively significant role of the oxymoron in the processes of reception and verbal representation of the world is proven. 

Reference: 
  1. Apinyan T. A. Essential-universal definition of the game: Phenomenology of the phantom. Problems of Philosophy, 2008, no. 2, pp. 58–73 (in Russian).
  2. Baranov A. N. Lingvisticheskaya ekspertiza teksta: teoriya i praktika [Linguistic Expertise of the Text: Theory and Practice]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2009. 592 p. (in Russian).
  3. Bondarko A. V. Grammaticheskoe znachenie i smysl [Grammatical meaning and meaning]. Leningrad, Nauka, 1978. 176 p. (in Russian).
  4. Bratukhin A. Y. Oxymoron in Early Christian and Byzantine Texts. Euro-Asian Journal for Humanities, 2019, no. 4, pp. 62–67 (in Russian).
  5. Fedorov A. V. Some lexico-semantic factors of the smyslovoy multiplanarity of the artistic text. Problems of Artistic Speech. Lexicology and lexicography. Vinogradiv Readings IX–X. Moscow, Nauka, 1981, pp. 71–82 (in Russian).
  6. Gustav Shpet i sovremennaya filosofiya gumanitarnogo znaniya [Gustav Späth and the Modern Philosophy of the Humanities]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Culture, 2006. 454 p. (in Russian).
  7. Ilyin V. N. The main problem of the theory of knowledge. Problems of Philosophy, 2009, no. 7, pp. 123– 134 (in Russian).
  8. Karasik V. I. Oxymoron in Language Consciousness and Communicative Practice. Social and Humanitarian Sciences, 2022, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 114–121 (in Russian).
  9. Losev A. F. Mif – chislo – sushchnost’ [Myth – number – essence]. Moscow, Mysl, 1994. 919 p. (in Russian).
  10. Mamardashvili M. K. Besedy o myshlenii [Conversations about Thinking]. St. Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Atticus, 2019. 480 p. (in Russian).
  11. Ortega y Gasset J. Izbrannye trudy [Selected works]. Moscow, Ves’ Mir, 2000. 704 p. (in Russian).
  12. Shestakova E. G. Oxymoron kak kategoriya poetiki (na materiale russkoi poezii XIX – pervoi treti XX vekov) [Oxymoron as a Category of Poetics (Based on the Material of Russian Poetry of the XIX – First Third of the XX Centuries)]. Donetsk, NORD-PRESS, 2009. 209 p. (in Russian).
  13. Slovar’ literaturovedcheskikh terminov. Red.-sost. L. I. Timofeev, S. V. Turaev [Timofeev L. I., Turaev S. V. eds. Dictionary of Literary Terms]. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1974. 509 p. (in Russian).
  14. Sorokin Y. A. Man Speaking in His Modes and Relations (Review-Discussion). In: Massovaya kul’tura na rubezhe XX–XIX vekov: Chelovek i ego diskurs: sb. nauch. st. [Mass Culture at the Turn of the XX–XIX Centuries: Man and His Discourse : Coll. sci. arts]. Moscow, Azbukovnik, 2003, pp. 7–23 (in Russian).
Received: 
01.11.2023
Accepted: 
18.01.2024
Published: 
30.08.2024