International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Anisimova A. T. Student comments on a professor’s rating as an evaluating speech genre in Russian and American educational discourse. Speech Genres, 2021, no. 2(30), pp. 109-117. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2021-2-30-109-117

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 463)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
[811.161.1+811.111]′27-057.87
EDN: 
BBJTPF

Student comments on a professor’s rating as an evaluating speech genre in Russian and American educational discourse

Autors: 
Anisimova Anna Tikhonovna, Kuban state agrarian University named after I. T. Trubilin
Abstract: 

This article focuses on the speech genre “student comments on a professor’s rating” which belongs to the domain of quality assurance in higher education. Both aspects are meaningful for the theory of speech genres and the system of higher education. The article analyses the communicative concept “student feedback on teaching” which is related to the speech genre under research. The article also deals with description and comparative analysis of speech genre features of axiological texts which belong to the domain of the “quality of education” in Russian and American linguistic cultures. Apart from this, the article attempts to classify the speech genre forms of students comments on teaching. On the basis of the comparative analysis of the speech genre “student feedback on teaching” in Russian and American education discourse there have been deduced several common and national specific language features and phenomena. The evaluating communicative concept “student feedback on teaching” comprises not only emotional evaluating attitude of the author but also a structural semiotic paradigm of the teaching evaluation. The American concept demonstrates higher semiotic density. The comparative analysis of verbal implementation of the concept in the Russian and American student feedback comments allows to conclude that the corresponding speech genre in American culture looks like an established speech practice, while into Russian culture this genre has been borrowed and is still being formed.      

Reference: 
  1. Arutyunova N. D. Axiology in the mechanisms of life and language. In: Problemy strukturnoj lingvistiki : sb. st. [Problems of Structural Linguistics : Coll Art]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1984, pp. 5–23 (in Russian).
  2. Arutyunova N. D. Tipy iazykovykh znachenii : Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of Linguistic Meanings : Assessment. Happening. Facts]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1988. 341 p. (in Russian).
  3. Bakhtin M. M. Problema rechevykh zhanrov [Problem of Speech Genres]. M. M. Bakhtin. Sobraniye sochineniy. T. 5. Raboty 1940 – nachala 1960-kh godov [Works. Vol. 5. Works of 1940 – Beginning of 1960]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul’tury Publ., 1997, pp. 159–206 (in Russian).
  4. Dementyev V. V. “Speech genre” theory and actual processes in contemporary speaking. Topics in the Study of Language, 2015, no. 6, pp. 78–107 (in Russian).
  5. Dementyev V. V. Axiological genristics : aspects of a problem “evaluation and genre”. Speech Genres, 2016, no. 2, pp. 9–24 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2016-214-9-24
  6. Dementyev V. V. Lingvoecology through the prism of speech genres : the sphere of new “technological” communications. Ecology of Language and Communicative Practice, 2015, iss. 2, pp. 22–47 (in Russian).
  7. Dementyev V. V. Some Methodological Principles of Study on Speech Genre Borrowings. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 2016, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 7–23 (in Russian).
  8. Dementyev V. V. Teoriya rechevykh zhanrov [Speech Genres Theory]. Мoscow, Znak Publ., 2010. 600 p. (in Russian).
  9. Dubrovskaya T. V. Rechevyje zhanry ‘osuzhdenije’ i ‘obvinenije’ v russkoj i anglijskoj lingvokulturakh [Speech Genres ‘Condemnation’ and ‘Accusation’ in Russian and English Lingual Cultures]. Penza, Izd-vo Penzenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014. 272 p. (in Russian).
  10. Govorunova L. Ju. Feedback of the tourist as a new speech genre in the tourist internet discourse. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2013, no. 1 (292), Philology. Art History, iss. 73, pp. 198–203 (in Russian).
  11. Indakova A. N. Speech genre of feedback about a tourist trip. In: Molodjozh’ i nauka : sb. materialov VII Vseros. nauch.-tehn. konf. studentov, aspirantov i molodyh uchjonyh, posvjash. 50-letiju pervogo poleta cheloveka v kosmos [Youth and Science : Proceedings of the VII AllRussian Scientific and Technical Conference of Students, Post-graduate Students and Young Scholars, Devoted to the 50th Anniversary of the First Space Flight of the Human]. Krasnojarsk, Sibirskij federal’nyj un-t, 2011 (in Russian). Available at: http://conf.sfu-kras.ru/sites/mn2011/section15.html (accessed 10.04.2021).
  12. Karasik V. I. Iazykovoi krug : lichnost’, kontsepty, diskurs [Language Circle : Personality, Concepts, Discourse]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2002. 477 p. (in Russian).
  13. Osetrova E. V. Speech genre of feedback in communication of the Internet community. Medialinguistics, iss. 3. Speech Genre in massmedia. Saint Petersburg, S.-Peterb. gos. un-t, In-t “Vyssh. shk. zhurn. i mass. kommunikacij”, 2014, pp. 200–204 (in Russian).
  14. Professor Rejting – rejting vuzov i prepodavatelej Rossii [Professor Rating – rating of Universities and Teachers in Russia]. Available at: https://professorrating.org (accessed 30.03.2020) (in Russian).
  15. Romanova T. V. Modal’nost. Otsenka. Emotsionalnost [Modality. Appraisal. Emotionality]. Nizhniy Novgorod, Novgorodskii gosudarstvennyi lingvisticheskii universitet, 2008. 309 p. (in Russian).
  16. Sedov K. F. Intragenre strategies of speech behavior : “quarrel”, “compliment”, “taunting”. Zhanry rechi : sb. nauch. st. (Speech Genres : Collection of Scientific Arts.). Saratov, GosUNTs “Kolledzh”, 1997, iss. 1. Available at: https://www.sgu.ru/structure/philological/linghist/sbornik-zhanry-rechi/... (accessed 10 April 2020) (in Russian).
  17. Shevchenko I. S. The concept of communicativebahaviour and genre. Speech Genres, 2015, no. 1 (11), pp. 24–30 (in Russian).
  18. Shmeleva T. V. Model of the speech genre. Zhanry rechi : sb. nauch. st. [Speech Genres : collection of Scientific Arts]. Saratov, GosUNTs “Kolledzh”, 1997, iss. 1, pp. 88–98 (in Russian).
  19. Slyshkin G. G. Speech genre : Prospects of conceptology analysis. Zhanry rechi : sb. nauch. tr. [Speech Genres : Collection of Scientific Arts.]. Saratov, ITs “Nauka”Publ. 2005, iss. 4, pp. 34–49 (in Russian).
  20. Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Available at: https://ncpa.ru/images/pdf/esg_enqa_rus.pdf (accessed 30 March 2020) (in Russian).
  21. Terskikh M. V. Internet comments in tourist discourse (marketing potential). Political Linguistics, 2014, no. 4 (50), pp. 274–283 (in Russian).
  22. Vol’f Ye. M. Funktsional’naya semantika otsenki [Functional Semantics of Evaluation]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1985. 228 p. (in Russian).
  23. Yeremina M. A. Speech Genre of Feedback in Internet Communicative Space. Scientific dialogue, 2016, no. 5 (53), pp. 34–45 (in Russian).
  24. Yurko V. E. Comparative analysis of speech genre “tourists’ internet review about the hotels” in english and russian linguacultures at the lexical level. Translation and Comparative Linguistics, 2016, no. 12, pp. 155–158 (in Russian).
Received: 
06.04.2020
Accepted: 
20.06.2020
Published: 
31.05.2021