International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Knorz O. V. Semantic-pragmatic potential of reports of refusal of communication in the roman of E. Vodolazkin “Lavr”. Speech Genres, 2021, no. 4(32), pp. 295-304. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2021-4-32-295-304

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 244)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
821.161.1-31.09+929 Водолазкин

Semantic-pragmatic potential of reports of refusal of communication in the roman of E. Vodolazkin “Lavr”

Autors: 
Knorz Olga Vladimirovna, Siberian Transport University
Abstract: 

The semantic and pragmatic potential of statements of refusal to communicate allows shedding light on the peculiarities of the phenomenon of silence, identifying its varieties, the specifics of manifestation in the Russian linguistic picture of the world and analyzing the functionality as part of a literary text. The concept of “refusal to communicate” is a broader phenomenon than the actual speech genre of refusal, since refusal as such implies a negative reaction only to initial motivational responses, while refusal of communication can become both a reaction to any statement or not be reactive at all, that is, to be the initial remark in the dialogue. The peculiarity of statements with the semantics of silence is manifested in the fact that their illocutionary goal is the impossibility or unwillingness to continue communication and is achieved using various linguistic means, first of all, lexemes denoting the speaking process, as well as modal modifiers expressing the reason for such speech behavior. The differences between speech genres, which are based on rejection, lie in the very object of rejection, in what the speaker rejects. In the Russian linguistic picture of the world, silence is characterized by the fact that it is a communicative action, it consists not in the absence of speech, but in the transmission of information in a non-verbal way. In this case, it is called communicatively meaningful silence. The analysis of the lexical structure of E. Vodolazkin’s novel “Laure” made it possible to identify important fragments of the text associated with silence, to obtain information about the author’s worldview and his attitude to the phenomenon of silence.

Acknowledgments: 
The author is grateful to Tatyana A. Tripolskaya, Doctor of Philology, Professor of the Modern Russian Language Department of Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University for her constructive ideas, valuable advice, and important comments, for her support in designing this research and discussing its results.
Reference: 
  1. Anokhina T. A. Communicative and pragmatic aspects of the silent effect. Vestnik SumGU, 2006, no. 3 (87), pp. 175–179 (in Ukrainian).
  2. Arutyunova N. D. Silence : Contexts of Use. In: Logicheskii analiz yazyka : Yazyk rechevykh deistvii [Logical analysis of language : Language of speech actions]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994, pp. 106–117 (in Russian).
  3. Babayan V. N. The silent observer and the phenomenon of silence as a communicative strategy in dialogue. Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Ser. 2. Philology. Art History, 2009, iss. 2, pp. 93–98 (in Russian).
  4. Bochkina B. M. Reflection of the medieval concept of time in the novels by E. Vodolazkin “Laurus” and “Aviator”. RUDN Bulletin. Ser. Literary Criticism. Journalism, 2017, no. 3, pp. 475–483 (in Russian).
  5. Bogdanov K. A. Ocherki po antropologii molchaniya : Homo Tacens [Essays on the Anthropology of Silence : Homo Tacens]. Saint Petersburg, Izd-vo Rus. khristian. gumanitar. in-tа, 1997. 349 p. (in Russian).
  6. Bogdanov V. V. Functions of verbal and non-verbal components in speech communication. In: Yazykovoe obshchenie : Edinitsy i regulyativy : sb. nauch. tr. [Language communication : Units and regulations : coll. sci. arts.]. Kalinin, Izd-vo KGU, 1987, pp. 18–24 (in Russian).
  7. Bogdanov V. V. Rechevoe obshchenie. Pragmaticheskie i semanticheskie aspekty [Verbal communication. Pragmatic and semantic aspects]. Leningrad, Izd-vo LGU, 1990. 90 p. (in Russian).
  8. Bogdanov V. V. Silence as a zero speech act and its role in verbal communication. In: Yazykovoe obshchenie i ego edinitsy : sb. nauch. tr. [Language communication and its units : coll. sci. arts.] Kalinin, Izd-vo KGU, 1986, pp. 12–18 (in Russian).
  9. Bolotnova N. S., Babenko I. I., Vasil’eva A. A. Kommunikativnaya stilistika khudozhestvennogo teksta : leksicheskaya struktura i idiostil’ [Communicative stylistics of a literary text : lexical structure and idiostyle]. Tomsk, Izd. dom Tom. gos. ped. un-ta, 2001. 331 p. (in Russian).
  10. Bunchuk T. N., Durkin A. I. Stylistic functions of the names of the characters in the novel “Laurel” by E. Vodolazkin. Ogarev-online, 2018, no. 5. Available at: http://journal.mrsu.ru/arts/stilisticheskie-funkciiimen-personazhej-v-ro... (accessed 12 November 2020) (in Russian).
  11. Bychikhina O. V. Vyskazyvaniya so znacheniem otkaza : Semantiko-pragmaticheskii i kognitivnyi aspekty [Discourse with the meaning of rejection : semanticpragmatic and cognitive aspects]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.) Barnaul, 2004. 216 p. (in Russian).
  12. Epshtein M. Word and silence in Russian culture. In: Ironiya ideala. Paradoksy russkoi literatury [The irony of the ideal. Paradoxes of Russian literature]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2015, pp. 247–281 (in Russian).
  13. Inubusi Ioko. Fenomen molchaniya kak komponent kommunikativnogo povedeniya [The phenomenon of silence 303 ISSN 2311-0740 as a component of communicative behavior]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2003. 24 p. (in Russian).
  14. Ivanova E. A. Linguocultural potential of the novel by E. Vodolazkin “Laurel”. The World of the Russian Word, 2014, no. 3, pp. 66–71 (in Russian).
  15. Kopylova T. R. Silence in Modern Linguistics : Approaches to Analysis. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series History and Philology, 2014, iss. 2, pp. 36–39 (in Russian).
  16. Krestinskii S. V. Silence as a means of communication and its functions in linguistic discourse. Herald of Tver State University. Ser. Philology, 2011, iss. 1, pp. 34– 37 (in Russian).
  17. Makhinina M. G., Sidorova M. M. Historical time in Vodolazkin’s novel “Laurel” (to the problem statement). Philology and Culture, 2016, no. 2, pp. 271–274 (in Russian).
  18. Makhinina M. G., Sidorova M. M. Mythologem of death / birth in the novel by E. Vodolazkin “Laurel”. Philology and Culture, 2017, no. 2, pp. 174–178 (in Russian)
  19. Nosova O. E. Proverbs about the role and place of silence : linguistic and cultural analysis. Bulletin of the Bashkir University, 2008, no. 13, pp. 543–546 (in Russian).
  20. Panova O. B., Kodochigova O. V. The traditions of ancient Russian culture in the novel by E. G. Vodolazkina “Lavr”. Yazyk i kul’tura : sb. st. XXIX mezhdunar. nauch. konf. (16–18 okt. 2018 g.) [Language and Culture : Collection of Articles of the XXIX International Scientific Conference (Tomsk, October 16–18, 2018)]. Tomsk, Izd. dom Tom. gos. un-ta, 2019, part. 1, pp. 62–69 (in Russian).
  21. Rudik І. M. Reactive silence in dialogical unity question – answer. Bulletin of the Kharkiv National University. N. V. Karazin, 2003, no. 611, pp. 144–146 (in Ukrainian).
  22. Ruzha O. A. On the question of the lexical organization of the text : the experience of reading the story of I. A. Bunin “Pines”. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/k-voprosu-o-leksicheskoyorganizatsii-t... (accessed 12 November 2020) (in Russian).
  23. Shutaya N. K. Basic topology in Vodolazkin’s novel “Laurel”. Philological Sciences. Questions of Theory and Practice, 2016, no. 11 (65), pp. 56–58 (in Russian).
  24. Slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka : v 17 t., pod red. A. M. Babkina, S. G. Barkhudarova, F. P. Filina [Babkin A. M., Barkhudarov S. G., Filin F. P., eds. Dictionary of Modern Russian Literary Language : in 17 vols.]. Moscow, Leningrad, Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1957, vol. 6, 1460 stb. (in Russian).
  25. Sternin I. A., Shilikhina K. M. Kommunikativnye aspekty tolerantnosti [Communicative aspects of tolerance]. Voronezh, Istoki Publ., 2001. 135 p. (in Russian).
  26. Teterleva E. V., Kuz’minykh T. D. Attitude towards silence in various linguistic cultures. In: Language : Russian. In book. Problemy romano-germanskoi filologii, filosofii, pedagogiki i metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov [Language : Russian. In book. Problems of Romano-Germanic philology, philosophy, pedagogy and methods of teaching foreign languages : coll. sci. arts.]. Perm, Perm. gos. ped. un-t, 2009, pp. 60–64 (in Russian).
  27. Trofimova N. V. Traditions of Old Russian Literature in the novel by E. G. Vodolazkin “Laurus”. Rhema, 2016, no. 2, pp. 7–20 (in Russian).
  28. Vodolazkin E. G. Lavr [Lavr]. Moscow, Astrel’ Publ., 2012. 448 p. (in Russian).
Received: 
08.01.2021
Accepted: 
23.03.2021
Published: 
30.11.2021