International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Karasik V. I. Reader’s comment as a genre of the modern Russian blog sphere . Speech Genres, 2024, vol. 19, iss. 1 (41), pp. 79-89. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2024-19-1-41-79-89, EDN: ETEOBH

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 307)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
81’27’42:004.738.5
EDN: 
ETEOBH

Reader’s comment as a genre of the modern Russian blog sphere

Autors: 
Karasik Vladimir Ilyich, Pushkin State Russian language Institute
Abstract: 

The paper deals with reader comments to blogs in Runet treated as a speech genre. The relevance of the topic lies in the fact that blogging is a common practice of public discussion concerning vital or interesting problems of present day life in Russia. The topics analyzed include social problems, historical issues, literature, ecology and technological progress. The aim of the article is to describe the types of comments to blogs. The constitutive impetus of the comments is the desire to keep free intercommunication with people who share the common interest. The commentators specify and correct the information, show their attitude to it and exercise their self-expression. Their reactions are mainly evaluating the facts reported in the blog, supporting or criticizing the blogger and demonstrating their Ego. The communicative distance usually corresponds to a colloquial mode of speech. However, the comments show that their authors often keep a professional level of knowledge of the facts spoken about. They demonstrate their interest when discussing the facts and various shades of irony when characterizing themselves. 

Reference: 
  1. Belyaeva I. S. Fiction commentary in the literature of Post-Modernism (on the material of Vladimir Nabokov works). Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2009. 18 p. (in Russian).
  2. Bryzhina T. S. Specificity of parody discourse. In: Krasavsky N. A., ed. Axiological Linguistics: Problems of Speech genres Theory, Gender Studies and Stylistics: Coll. of sci. arts. Volgograd, College, 2008, pp. 32–39 (in Russian).
  3. Dementyev V. V. Teoriya rechevykh zhanrov [The Theory of Speech Genres]. Moscow, Znak, 2010. 600 p. (in Russian).
  4. Filippova M. P. An Internet comment and Internet forum post: Parameters of genre differentiation. Journal of Udmurt University. History and Philology Series, 2020, no. 6, pp. 1049–1053 (in Russian).
  5. Fowler D. P. Criticism as Commentary and Commentary as Criticism in the Age of Electronic Media. In: Most G. W., ed. Commentaries – Kommentare. Göttingen, Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht, 1999, pp. 426–442 (in Russian).
  6. Heslin P. The dream of a universal variorum: Digitizing the commentary tradition. In: Classical Commentaries: Explorations in a Scholarly Genre. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2016, pp. 494–511.
  7. Ionova S. V. Approksimatsiya soderzhaniya vtorichnykh tekstov: monografiya [Approximation of secondary texts content: A monograph]. Volgograd, Volgograd State University Publ., 2006. 380 p. (in Russian).
  8. Karasik V. I. Commentary as a genre of hermeneutic discourse. Language, Communication and Social Environment. Voronezh, O. Yu. Aleynikov Publishers, 2009, iss. 7, pp. 32–47 (in Russian).
  9. Kolokol’tseva T. N. Dialogue in Internet communication genres (chat, forum, blog). Speech Genres, 2016, no. 2 (14), pp. 96–104 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2016-2-14-96-104
  10. Kraus C. S. Introduction: Reading commentaries / commentaries as reading. In: Gibson R. K., Kraus C. S., eds. Classical Commentary: History, Practices, Theory. Leiden, Brill, 2002, pp. 1–27.
  11. Kravtsova E. V., Khomutova T. N. Science review: An integral approach. Language and Culture, 2014, no. 1 (25), pp. 70–76 (in Russian).
  12. Lopukhin A. P. The Explanatory Bible, or a Commentary to all the books of the Holy Scripture of Old and New Testaments. Stokholm, The Institute of the Bible Translation. Available at: http://www.lopbible.narod.ru (accessed May 15, 2022). (in Russian).
  13. Lotman Yu. M. Roman A. S. Pushkina “Evgenii Onegin”. Kommentarii: posobie dlya uchitelya [The Novel “Eugen Onegin” by A. S. Pushkin. A Commentary. A manual for teachers]. Leningrad, Prosveshchenie, 1983. 416 p. (in Russian).
  14. Medvedev S. A. On the methodology of Internet reviews typology description. Philology and Man, 2017, no. 4, pp. 121–127 (in Russian).
  15. Mit’agina V. A. An Internet Comment as a communicative action. In: Genres and Types of Text in Scientific and Media Discourse: Coll. of sci. arts. Oryol, Gorizont, 2012, pp. 188–197 (in Russian).
  16. Orlova E. V., Tolkushkina E. E. A Theatre review as a genre of publicist and media discourse. Communication Studies, 2014, no. 2, pp. 204–212 (in Russian).
  17. Panchenko N. N. Genre specificity of “styob” (jive) in the Internet communication. Speech Genres, 2016, no. 2, pp. 116–122 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/23110740-2016-2-14-116-122
  18. Rogacheva N. B. New Priorities in the Russian Internet communication: On the material of the genre “blog”. Zanry rechi: sb. nauch. st. [Speech Genres: Coll. sci. arts, vol. 5. Genre and Culture]. Saratov, ITs “Nauka”, 2007, pp. 389–403 (in Russian).
  19. Schipitsina L. Yu. Zhanry komp’yuternooposredovannoi kommunikatsii [Genres of the Computer Mediated Communication]. Arkhangelsk, Pomor University Publ., 2009. 238 p. (in Russian).
  20. Steksova T. I. Commentary as a speech genre and its variation. Speech Genres, 2014, no. 1-2 (9-10), pp. 81– 88 (in Russian).
  21. Viktorova E. Yu. Linguocreative potential of the Internet Communication (on the material of network genre). Speech Genres, 2018, no. 4 (20), pp. 294–303 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2018-4-20-294-303
  22. Zemtsova L. V. Systemic features and genre functions of arts review in mass media. Units of speech and their functioning: Coll. of sci. arts. Saratov, Nauchnaya kniga, 2005, vol. 5, pp. 196–202 (in Russian).
Received: 
18.08.2022
Accepted: 
04.10.2022
Published: 
01.03.2024