International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Viktorova E. Y., Panteeva K. V. An Internet comment as a speech genre: Axiological aspect. Speech Genres, 2023, vol. 18, iss. 1 (37), pp. 66-73. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2023-18-1-37-66-73, EDN: HGVVCL

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 852)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
004.738.5:81′42
EDN: 
HGVVCL

An Internet comment as a speech genre: Axiological aspect

Autors: 
Viktorova Elena Yurievna, Saratov State University
Panteeva Ksenia Vladimirovna, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The article presents the analysis of evaluation in the speech genre “Internet comment” and focuses on the ways and means of its expression. The research is based on the comments on Instagram (organization banned on the territory of the Russian Federation) posts about sports, namely figure skating. The authors of the article define two relevant factors determining axiological characteristics of the Internet comment: anonymity of Internet communication and the desire of many users to stand out from other commentators. The anonymity factor leads to a more frequent use of negative evaluation and more explicit ways of its expression: online communication gives users more freedom in expressing their opinions. Since for many people expressing their opinion is equivalent to expressing disagreement with an opposite point of view, negative evaluation in the analyzed Internet comments significantly prevails over positive evaluation. Furthermore, anonymous and remote communication in cyberspace provides a suitable environment for criticizing other people’s ideas neglecting etiquette rules obligatory for face-to-face communication. The general tendency towards rather negative attitudes in the analyzed Internet comments results in more various means of expressing negative evaluation compared with the ones of expressing positive evaluation because users criticizing an Internet post may try to find more original ways of articulating their views. Thus, the research revealed that positive evaluation is mostly expressed with the help of evaluative vocabulary whereas negative evaluation in the analyzed comments can be also expressed by means of specific vocabulary as well as rhetorical questions, rhetorical exclamations, metaphors, neologisms. Indirect means of expressing evaluation can draw more attention to a comment, foster linguistic persuasion which finally helps the author of an Internet comment stand out from the crowd.

Reference: 
  1. Šetka Čilić I., Ilić Plauc J. Today’s Usage of Neologisms in Social Media Communication. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2021, no. 6, pp. 115–140. https://doi.org/10.51558/2490-3647.2021.6.1.115
  2. Andreeva O. A. The tactics of softening the categoricity of the statement (based on the author’s personal notes of conversational speech). Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, 2013, vol. 13, iss. 2, pp. 24–30 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/18177115-2013-13-2-24-30
  3. Crystal D. Language and the Internet, 2nd edition. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006. 316 p.
  4. Hu C., Kumar S., Huang J., Ratnavelu K. Disinhibition of Negative True Self for Identity Reconstructions in Cyberspace: Advancing Self-discrepancy Theory for Virtual Setting. PloS One, 2017, no. 12, iss 4. https://doi.org/10. 1371/journal.pone.0175623
  5. Internet-kommunikatsiia kak novaia rechevaia formatsiia. Nauch. red. T. N. Kolokol’tseva, O. V. Lutovinova [Kolokol’tseva T. N., Lutovinova O. V., eds. Internet Communication as a New Speech Formation]. Moscow, Flinta Publ., Nauka Publ., 2016. 328 p. (in Russian).
  6. Kolokol’tseva T. N. Disalogueness in Internet genres (chat, forum, blog). Speech Genres, 2016, no. 2 (14), pp. 96–104 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/23110740-2016-2-14-96-104
  7. Mitiagina V. A., Sidorova I. G. Genres of personal Internet discourse: Communicative explications of the personality. Speech Genres, 2016, no. 2 (14), pp. 105–115 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2016-214-105-115
  8. Panchenko N. N. Genre individuality of mockery in internet communication. Speech Genres, 2016, no. 2 (14), pp. 116–122 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/23110740-2016-2-14-116-122
  9. Riskogennost sovremennoy kommunikatsii i rol kommunikativnoy kompetentnosti v eye preodolenii. Pod red. O. B. Sirotininoi, M. A. Kormilitsynoi [Sirotinina O. B., Kormilitsyna M. A., eds. The risks of modern communication and the role of communicative competence in overcoming them]. Saratov, Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2015. 188 p. (in Russian).
  10. Shchipitsina L. Yu. Genre status of an online comment. Bulletin of Bashkir University, 2015, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 528–532 (in Russian).
  11. Shilikhina K. M. Lexical markers of the online communication genres. Speech Genres, 2018, no. 3 (19), pp. 218–225 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/23110740-2018-3-19-218-225
  12. Steksova T. I. Comment as a speech genre and its variability. Speech Genres, 2014, no. 1-2 (9-10), pp. 81–88 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2014-1-29-10-81-88
  13. Viktorova E. Iu. Potential capacity of linguistic creativity in internet communication (based on the genre of social networks). Speech Genres, 2018, no. 4 (20), pp. 294–303 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-20184-20-294-303
Received: 
03.02.2022
Accepted: 
04.03.2022
Published: 
01.03.2023