For citation:
Sharonov I. A. Phatic units of language and the theory of speech genres. Speech Genres, 2025, vol. 20, iss. 3 (47), pp. 231-238. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2025-20-3-47-231-238, EDN: FBYBFF
Phatic units of language and the theory of speech genres
The article discusses approaches to the description of the phatic communication domain and the connection between the concept of phatics and the theory of speech genres. The proposed consideration of the concept of phatics is based on the fundamental difference between the approaches to phatics by B. Malinowski and by R. Jakobson. Reliance on the function of contact maintenance makes it possible to identify a separate group of linguistic means that formalize speech subgenres of microdialogue. These means are considered as the domain of phatics 1 (F1). They serve exclusively to maintain the process of communication and are “superimposed” on the informative component of the microdialogue. The means of F1 are subdivided into linguistic units and rhetorical devices. The area of phatics 2 (F2) includes small talk, i. e. discursive structures that are fundamentally different from the linguistic means of area F1. The article focuses on the typology of linguistic units of phatics 1. Alongside the already well-known and well-described units, such as vocatives and etiquette formulas, the group of F1 units also includes dialogic discursives (introductory words marking the speech act and increasing the impact on the interlocutor, such as: would you be so kind, don’t be silly, I’m telling you, etc.), tag questions (isn’t it?, okay?) and communicatives (short stereotyped responses: sure, no way, you bet, deal, not a chance, etc.). All these units have special discourse-pragmatic properties that are strictly connected with the speech subgenres they formalize. Due to their properties, F1 linguistic units can become the object of specialized lexicographic description.
- Balakaj A. G. Slovar russkogo rechevogo etiketa [Dictionary of Russian speech etiquette]. Moscow, ASTPRESS, 2001. 672 p. (in Russian).
- Bobrik M. A. Mechanisms of pragmaticalization in the history of the Russian formula of farewell Schastlivo!. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2021, no. 1, pp. 70–83 (in Russian).
- Bragina N. G. “Kindred” forms of address to non-relatives and principles of their description. Rozanova N. N., ed. Russian Language Today. Iss. 5: Problems of Verbal Communication: A collection of papers. Moscow, FLINTA, Nauka, 2012, pp. 32–42 (in Russian).
- Dementyev V. V. Phatic speech genres. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1999, no. 1, pp. 37–55 (in Russian).
- Dobrushina N. R., Danova M. K. Hello. In: Dva veka v dvadtsati slovakh. Otv. red. N. R. Dobrushina, M. A. Daniel’ [Dobrushina N. R., Daniel’ M. A., eds. Two Centuries in Twenty Words]. Moscow, Izdatel’skii dom Vysshej shkoly ekonomiki, 2016, pp. 251–270 (in Russian).
- Formanovskaya N. I. Kultura obshcheniya i rechevoĭ etiket [Culture of communication and speech etiquette]. Moscow, Ikar, 2005. 159 p. (in Russian).
- Formanovskaya N. I. Russkij rechevoj etiket. Lingvisticheskij i metodicheskij aspekty [Russian speech etiquette. Linguistic and methodological aspects]. Moscow, URSS, 2024. 160 p. (in Russian).
- Krongauz M. A. Addresses as a way of modeling communicative space. In: Logicheskij analiz yazyka. Obraz cheloveka v kulture i yazyke. Otv. red. N. D. Arutyunova, I. B. Levontina [Arutyunova N. D., Levontina I. B., eds. Logical analysis of language. The image of a person in culture and language]. Moscow, Indrik, 1999, pp. 124–134 (in Russian).
- Krongauz M. A. Formula of farewell Davaj in synchronous and diachronic aspects. Russkij yazyk za rubezhom, 2021, № 2, pp. 33–40 (in Russian).
- Kustova G. I. On the communicative status of introductory constructions with mental predicates. Proceedings of the V. V. Vinogradov Russian Language Institute, 2020, no. 3 (25), pp. 62–75 (in Russian).
- Levontina I. B. Russian final a?: Portrait of an invisible man. In: Slovo v tekste i v slovare: sbornik statej k semidesyatiletiyu akademika Yu. D. Apresyana [Word in text and in dictionary: Coll. of art. didicated to the 70th anniversary of academican Yu. D. Apresyan]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, 2000, pp. 144–152 (in Russian).
- Malinowski B. The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. London, Kegan Paul, Trench and Trubner, 1923, pp. 296–336.
- Matyuhina Yu. V., Shevchenko I. S. Pragmatic features of phatic metacommunicative information in discourse. In: Materials of the international conference “Treti Karazinski chitannya: metodika i lingvistika – na shlyahu do integraciyi”. Harkiv, HNU named after V. N. Karazin, 2003, pp. 110–111 (in Russian).
- Panteleeva E. A. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskie svojstva vvodnykh i vstavnykh elementov v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Communicative and pragmatic properties of introductory and insertional elements in modern Russian]. Moskow, Znanie-M, 2021. 192 p. (in Russian).
- Ratmayr R. Functional and cultural-comparative aspects of pragmatic cliches (based on the Russian and German languages). Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1997, no. 1, pp. 15–23 (in Russian).
- Ratmayr R. Pragmatika izvineniya: Sravnitelnoe issledovanie na materiale russkogo yazyka i russkoj kultury [Pragmatics of apology: A comparative study based on the Russian language and Russian culture]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kul’tur, 2003, 272 p. (in Russian).
- Sharonov I. A., Kushesh Z. A. Description of communicative consent / willingness to perform an action in Russian. Culture and Text, 2024, no. 4 (59), pp. 95–107 (in Russian).
- Sharonov I. A. PProblems of describing Russian communications consisting of function words. Izvestiya Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, 2012, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 7–13 (in Russian).
- Sharonov I. A. Semantic and pragmatic aspects of description of introductory words and communicatives. Tomsk State University. Journal of Philology, 2018, no. 51, pp. 58–68 (in Russian).
- Vinokur T. G. Informative and phatic speech as a manifestation of different communicative intentions of the speaker and listener. In: Russkij yazyk v ego funktsionirovanii. Kommunikativno-pragmaticheskij aspect [Russian language in its functioning. Communicativepragmatic aspect]. Moscow, Nauka, 1993, pp. 2–29 (in Russian).
- Yakobson R. Linguistics and poetics. In: Strukturalizm: “za” i “protiv” [Structuralism: “For” and “against”]. Moscow, Progress, 1975, pp. 193–230 (in Russian).
- Yanko T. E. Russian addresses: Dictionary information and vocative constructions. Computer Linguistics and Intelligent Technologies: Based on the materials of the International Conference “Dialogue 2009” (Bekasovo, May 27–31, 2009). Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 2009, pp. 574–579 (in Russian).