International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Nikitina L. B., Malyshkin K. U. The speech genre of a scientific review: A view at the assessment as-sertiveness. Speech Genres, 2015, no. 2(12), pp. 72-79. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2015-2-12-72-79

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 318)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
821.161.1.09-9
EDN: 
VLFUKR

The speech genre of a scientific review: A view at the assessment as-sertiveness

Autors: 
Nikitina Larisa Borisovna, Omsk State Pedagogical University
Malyshkin Konstantin Urievich, Omsk State Pedagogical University
Abstract: 

Assessment is a compulsory semantic component of the speech genre of a scientific review. The evaluative nature of the scientific review along with its dependence on norms of science-based ethics determines the significance of such category as assertiveness for the speech genre. Assertiveness is defined as expressed by linguistic and non-linguistic means and characterized by extra-linguistic conditionality, as a semantic-pragmatic category of statement, having a modus nature and correlated with the process of demonstrating the degree of speaker's confidence and peremptoriness to the conveyed information. A positive assessment in scientific reviews accepts both indirect and direct ways of expression and is substantially free of ethical taboos, whereas a negative assessment needs implications which allow softening the position of a reviewer. The article looks into lexical and semantic means of indirectly expressed negative assessment typical of scientific reviews.

Reference: 
  1. Grishechkina G. U. Kommunikativnyj aspekt nauchnoj recenzii [The communicative aspect of scientific review]. Obrazovanie. Kommunikaciya. Cennosti (Problemy, diskussii, perspektivy). Po materialamkruglogostola «Kommunikativnyepraktiki v obrazovanii», 19 noyabrya 2004 goda [Education. Communication. Values (Problems, discussions, prospects). Based on materials from the roundtable «Communication Practices in Education», November 19, 2004. Еd. by S. I. Dudnik]. St.-Petersburg, 2004, pp. 22–25.
  2. Kobzeeva O. V. Stilezhanroobrazuyushhaya rol aksiologicheskix znachenij i sredstv ix vyrazheniya vo vtorichnyx zhanrax sovremennoj russkoj rechi: nauchnoj recenzii, teatralnoj recenzii, otzyve [Style-genre-generating role of axiological values and means of their expression in secondary genres of modern Russian language: the scientific reviews, theater reviews, reference]. Lingvistika cheloveka: antologiya [Linguistics of the person: anthology. Ed. by L. B. Nikitina, N. D. Fedyaeva]. Omsk, 2012, pp. 236–249.
  3. Malyshkin K. U. Kategorichnost kak semantiko-pragmaticheskaya kategoriya vyskazyvaniya (na materiale sovremennogo russkogo yazyka) [The categoricalness as the semantic-pragmatic category of statement (on a material of modern Russian language). Cand. philol. sci. thesis diss]. Omsk, 2015. 21 p.
  4. Pribytkova S. A. Semantiko-pragmaticheskie osobennosti elektronnoj recenzii kak vtorichnogo teksta (na material anglijskogo yazyka) [The semantic and pragmatic features of the electronic review as a secondary text (on a material of English language). Cand. philol. sci. diss.]. Tambov, 2004. 183 p.
  5. Salimovsky V. A. Zhanry rechi v funkcionalno-stilisticheskom osveshhenii (Russkij nauchnyj akademicheskij tekst) [Genres of speech in the functional-stylistic interpretation (Russian scientific academic text). Dr. philol. sci. diss.]. Ekaterinburg, 2002. 343 p.
Received: 
27.11.2015
Accepted: 
27.11.2015
Published: 
27.11.2015