International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)

For citation:

Balashova E. Y., Nagoga O. V., Makshantseva E. A. The pragmalinguistic analysis of legislative genre (based on texts of german laws). Speech Genres, 2021, no. 2(30), pp. 101-108. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2021-2-30-101-108

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 221)
Article type: 

The pragmalinguistic analysis of legislative genre (based on texts of german laws)

Balashova Elena Yurevna, Saratov State Law Academy
Nagoga Olga Vladimirovna , Saratov State Law Academy
Makshantseva Elena Anatolyevna, Saratov State Law Academy

As a rule, legal genres are subdivided into three large thematic groups: “Legislation” (laws, regulations, instructions, acts, orders), “Case law” (judicial decisions, appeals, protocols, court orders and court inquiries), “Official documentation” (official correspondence, reports, contracts). This research focuses on the pragmalinguistic and linguo-stylistic analysis of German legislative texts. The authors describe the characteristics of legislative genres and single out their general and special language functions. The relevance of the article is based on the fact that in Russia and abroad there are few linguistic papers on the analysis of legislative genre and law texts. In the meantime, the given research direction is highly prospective for interdisciplinary studies. The authors argue that the function of nomination, the function of message, the function of influence and the function of communication are vividly manifested in legislative genre via multilevel language means. A pragmatic analysis of the legal norms of the German legislative texts shows that the latter are characterized by imperative and dispositive legal norms, while recommendatory legal norms for the texts of German laws are less typical. The methodological base of research includes contextual and functional analysis, linguo-stylistic techniques as well as descriptive and linguo-pragmatic methods of analysis.  

  1. Austin J. “Truth”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 1950, Suppl. vol., no. 24, pp. 111–128; reprinted in Austin, 1979, pp. 117–133. DOI: 10.1093/019283021X.003.0005
  2. Bühler K. Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena, Fischer, 1934. 434 S.
  3. Berūkštienė D. Legal discourse reconsidered: genres of legal texts. Comparative Legilinguistics, 2016, vol. 28. Available at: (accessed 18 June 2018).
  4. Eriksson O. The Pragmatic Language Functionality of Information Systems. Available at: (accessed 5 May 2020).
  5. Gavasheli T. V. Sistematizatsiya zakonodatelstva v Germanii [The Systematization of German Legislation]. Available at: zakonodatelstva- v- germanii/viewer (accessed 23 November 2020) (in Russian).
  6. Große E. U. Text und Kommunikation: EinelinguistischeEinführung in die Funktion der Texte. Stuttgart, Berlin, W. Kohlhammer, 1976. 164 S.
  7. Habermas J. Communicative Rationality and the Theories of Meaning and Action. In: Cooke M., ed. Habermas J. On the Pragmatics of Communication. Cambridge, Massachussetts, MIT Press, 1986. 454 p.
  8. Halliday M. A. Language as Social Semiotic : The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London, Edward Arnold, 1978. 132 p.
  9. Kerimov D. A. Zakonodatelnaya tekhnika [The Legislative Technique]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2000. 125 p. (in Russian).
  10. Kindermann H. Die Rechtlinien der Gesetzestechnik. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1978. 646 S.
  11. Malko A. V. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava v voprosah i otvetah [The Theory of State and law in Questions and Answers]. 3rd ed. Moscow, Jurist Publ., 1999. 272 p. (in Russian).
  12. Marchenko M. N. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [The Theory of State and Law]. 2nd ed. Moscow, Prospekt Publ., 2004. 800 p. (in Russian).
  13. Martine A. Foundations of General linguistics. New in Linguistics [Collection of Research Papers. Translation]. Vol. 3. Moscow, Publisher of Foreign Literature, 1963, pp. 347–566.
  14. Morris Ch. Signs, Language and Behavior. New York, Prentice Hall, Inc., 1946. 356 p.
  15. Naer V. L. Pragmatic essence of stylistic markedness. Problems of Stylistic Markedness (Collection of research papers). Iss. 356. Moscow, Moscow State Linguistic University, 1990, pp. 4–9.
  16. Nikitina V. V. English linguocultural specifics of business discourse. In: Ekolinguistika : teoriya, problem, metody [Collection of Research Papers]. Saratov, Nauchnaya Kniga Publ., 2003, pp. 74–78 (in Russian).
  17. Sbisà M., Urmson J. O., eds. Austin J. How to Do Things with Words. 2nd ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1975. 174 p.
  18. Stepanov Yu. S. Metody i printsipy sovremennoi linguistiki [The Methods and Principles of Modern Linguisitics]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1975. 313 p. (in Russian).
  19. Tiersma P. M. The Creation, Structure and Interpretation of the Legal Text. Available at: (accessed 18 June 2018).
  20. Turi Joseph-G. Language Law and Language Rights. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse, Australia, Hong Kong and UK, Academic Scholars Publishing House, 2012, vol. 2, iss. 4, pp. 1–18.
  21. Vinogradov V. V. Stylistica, theoriya poeticheskoi rechi, poetica [Stylistics, the Theory of Poetic Speech, Poetics]. Moscow, Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1963. 259 p. (in Russian).