For citation:
Bragina N. G., Vasyutina E. В. The genre of video apology in the context of contemporary ethics and politeness. Speech Genres, 2025, vol. 20, iss. 3 (47), pp. 309-318. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2025-20-3-47-309-318, EDN: VXBJIX
The genre of video apology in the context of contemporary ethics and politeness
The paper focuses on the description of the genre of video apology, its forms and linguistic features. This genre has taken shape over the last decade and functions in the sphere of networked public discourse characterized in the paper. The popularity of on-camera apologies is increasing and attracts the attention of specialists from different spheres. This necessitates a linguistic comprehension of video apologies viewed as a polycode genre. The material under analysis comprises more than 25 video clips posted online over the last 10 years. The paper describes the differences between interpersonal, public, and video apologies as well as general prerequisites of the latter related to the violation of ethical norms accepted in society and correlated norms of polite speech actions and behaviours. The features of the communicative situation of a video apology discussed in the paper include: different composition of participants, the variability of its components depending on the hosting platform, and long storage in the internet space. We distinguish two main forms of video apologies: monological and question-and-answer ones – and identify the most frequent speech clichés and strategies.
- Barthes R. The Division of Languages (in The Rustle of Language). Berkeley and Los Angeles, University of California Press, 1989, pp. 111–124.
- Bragina N. G., Vasyutina E. V. Apology speech act in the context of modern online publicity. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies Series, 2024, no. 8, pp. 42–55. https://doi.org/10.28995/26867249-2024-8-42-55 (in Russian).
- Bragina N. G. Speech cliches: Aspects of linguistic study. Russian Language Abroad, 2023, vol. 5 (300), pp. 10–15 (in Russian).
- Brooks R. L. When Sorry Isn’t Enough: The Controversy Over Apologies and Reparations for Human Injustice. New York, New York University Press, 1999. 536 p.
- Dementyev V. V. Teorija rechevykh zhanrov: monografiia [Theory of speech genres: Monograph]. Moscow, Znak, 2010. 600 p. (in Russian).
- Drew P., Hepburn A., Margutti P., Galatolo R. Introduction to the Special Issue on Apologies in Discourse. Discourse Processes, 2016, vol. 53 (1-2), pp. 1–4.
- Fassin D. The Ethical Turn in Anthropology: Promises and Uncertainties. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2014, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 429–435.
- Frevert U. Ehrenmänner. Das Duell in der bürgerlichen Gemeinschaft. München, Beck, 1991. 376 S. (in German).
- Gibney M., Howard-Hassmann R. E., Coicaud J.M., Steiner N. The Age of Apology: Facing Up to the Past. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008. 344 p.
- John R. Searle. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 1976, no. 5, pp. 1–23.
- Kapustina E. L., Khonineva E. A. The “Sorrystan”: Public Apologies and Moral Order in Today’s Dagestan. Ethnographic Review, 2023, no. 2, pp. 111–133. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869541523020069 (in Russian).
- Kharkhordin O. V. Oblichat’ i litsemerit’: genealogija rossijskoj lichnosti [To expose and to be hypocritical: The genealogy of the Russian personality]. Saint Petersburg, Saint Petersburg European University at St. Petersburg Publ., 2002. 511 p. (in Russian).
- Koshkarova N. N., Yakovleva E. M. Discourse of new emotionality: Communicative practices of digital reality. Political Linguistics, 2019, no. 5 (77), pp. 147–152 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.26170/pl19-05-15
- Koshkarova N. N. Public apology: Yesterday, today, tomorrow. Speech Genres, 2020, vol. 3 (27), pp. 214–221. (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2020-327-214-221
- Lakoff R. Apologies as Language Politics. Zhanry rechi: sb. nauch. st. [Speech Genres: Coll. of sci. arts]. Saratov, ITs “Nauka”, 2007, iss. 5, pp. 183–192 (in Russian).
- Lakoff R. T. Nine Way of Looking at Apologies: The Necessity for Interdisciplinary Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis. Handbook of Discourse, 2001, vol. 2, pp. 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch11
- Panchenko N. N. “Frank confession” in institutional and everyday communication: Speech genre or speech action. Speech Genres, 2022, vol. 17, no. 3 (35), pp. 186–193 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2022-173-35-186-193, EDN: VFLKLU
- Rathmayr R. Pragmatik der Entschuldigungen. Vergleichende Untersuchung am Beispiel der russischen Sprache und Kultur. Köln, Weimar, Wien, Böhlau Verlag, 1996. 243 S. (in German).
- Rathmayr R. Strategies of Conflict Resolution and Mitigation: The Potential of the Speech Act of Apologizing in the Perspective of Intercultural Pragmatics. Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Linguistics, 2020, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 6–17 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2020.1.1
- Riepl W. Das Nachrichtenwesen des Altertums mit besonderer Rücksicht Jahraus: Medienwissenschaft und Medientheorie. Seite 8 auf die Römer. Hildesheim, Olms, 1972. 478 p.
- Shulginov V. A., Mustafin R. Zh., Tillabaeva A. A. Regular im/politness in internet communication: Discursive shift in using etiquette formulas of gratitude. Culture and Text, 2022, vol. 1 (48), pp. 177–187 (in Russian).