International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Pervukhina S. V., Ryabtseva i. G. The “Environmental Debate” Genre. Speech Genres, 2026, vol. 21, iss. 1 (49), pp. 50-59. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2026-21-1-49-50-59, EDN: PODOPB

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 43)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
574:81’38’42
EDN: 
PODOPB

The “Environmental Debate” Genre

Autors: 
Pervukhina Svetlana Vladimirovna, Don State Technical University
Ryabtseva irina Gennadyevna, Don State Technical University
Abstract: 

In relation to serious global climatic changes, there is an activation of speech acts within the framework of ecological discourse. The analyzed material allows discussing the emergence of a new type of speech genre of debates, such as environmental debates (ED). TV companies organize ED as part of election campaigns and for the purpose of obtaining information about the current processes from specialists of related fields. ED differ from classical debates in a number of their characteristics. The special compositional, linguistic and pragmatic characteristics of ecological debates allow them to be identified as an independent genre of speech. The article aims to reveal the characteristics of the ED genre by describing their constitutive features. For this purpose, we analyzed ED in several countries, conducted corpus analysis of the ED to identify some pragmatic and temporal characteristics, and performed linguistic analysis. Communicative analysis revealed such tactics as argumentation, analyzing the situation, explanation, clarification, predicting the most probable ways of developing the situation, etc. As a result, argumentative and expressive types of communication were found. ED in terms of temporal characteristics assume a perfunctory, present and futural perspective. The following thematic blocks were identified within the analyzed debates: recognition of the existence of the environmental crisis situation, pride and expression of love for one’s country and the desire to preserve its nature, criticism of those who neglect these values, and presentation of a set of measures to protect nature. ED actualize the national and global value of nature conservation as a way to self-preservation of mankind.

Reference: 
  1. Bakhtin M. M. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1986. 423 p. (in Russian).
  2. Dementyev V. V. “Questionnaire of speech genre” by T. V. Shmeleva: Past, present, future (to the 30th anniversary of the genre model). Speech Genres, 2020, no. 4 (28), pp. 252–262 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2020-4-28-252-262
  3. Dementyev V. V. On the problem of integral description of speech genres. Speech Genres, 2024, vol. 19, no. 1 (41), pp. 6–22 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2020-4-28-252-262
  4. Filippova T. A. The concept and main characteristics of environmental discourse (on the material of English-language media). Izvestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical Iniversity. Philology, 2018, no. 2 (125), pp. 97–101 (in Russian).
  5. Genre in the modern media sphere. Zhanry rechi: sb. nauch. st. Vyp. 8. Pamyati K. F. Sedova [Speech Genres: Coll. of sci. arts. Iss. 8. In Memory of K. F. Sedov]. Saratov, Moscow, Labirint, 2012, pp. 26–37 (in Russian).
  6. Golovina N. M. Mediatization of PMQS political debates: Transformation of the self-representational model I + verb in the institutional discourse of British political debates. Communication Studies, 2019, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 467–481 (in Russian).
  7. Gusakova T. I. Some features of speech tactics of political leaders: Pre-election debates in the USA. Innovacionnost’ i mul’tikompetentnost’ v prepodavanii i izuchenii inostrannyh yazykov: sb. nauch. st. Otv. red. N. M. Memeko [Memeko N. M., ed. Innovation and multicompetence in teaching and foreign languages: Coll. of sci. arts]. Moscow, RUDN University Publ., 2017, pp. 149–157 (in Russian).
  8. Jioeva V. P. Parliamentary debates as a genre of political discourse in the Republic of South Ossetia. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 2019, no. 1, pp. 31–38 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.29025/2076-6021-2019-1-31-38
  9. Kolmogorova A. V., Kozachina A. V. Speech genre in the dynamics of discourse. Terra Linguistica, 2023, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 79–94 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18721/JHSS.14406
  10. Lemmerman H. Uroki ritoriki i debatov [Lessons of rhetoric and debates]. Moscow, Unikum Press, 2002. 336 p. (in Russian).
  11. Lyapon M. V. Modality. In: Yazykoznanie. Bol’shoj entsiklopedicheskij slovar’. Gl. red. V. N. Yartseva [Yartseva V. N., ed. Linguistics Large Encyclopediic Dictionary]. Moscow, Bol’shaya Rossijskaya entsiklopediya, 1998, pp. 303–304 (in Russian).
  12. Nemceva K. D. English texts of political debates as a speech genre. Povolzhskij pedagogicheskij vestnik, 2020, vol. 8, no. 2 (27), pp. 36–40 (in Russian).
  13. Pervukhina S. V., Toporkova O. V. Text and context. Aktual’nye problemy nauki i tekhniki: materialy Vserossiiskoi (natsional’noi) nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii (Rostov n/D, 15–17 marta 2023 g.). Otv. red. N. A. Shevchenko [Shevchenko N. A., ed. Current Issues of Science and and Technology: Materials of the All-Russian national sci. and pract. conf. (Rostov-on-Don, March 15–17, 2023)]. Rostov-on-Don, Don State Technical University Publ., 2023, pp. 452–453 (in Russian).
  14. Pervukhina S. V. Context awareness in the electronic dialog format. Vestnik of Samara University. History, pedagogics, philology, 2023, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 181–187 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18287/25420445-2023-29-1-181-187
  15. Romanov A. A. Evaluation as a way of fixing the conflictuality of a politician’s speech behavior. Politicheskij diskurs v Rossii–4: materialy rabochego soveshchaniya (Moskva, 22 aprelya 2000 g.) [Political Discourse in Russia–4: Materials of the working meeting (Moscow, April 22, 2000)]. Moscow, Dialog-MGU, 2000, pp. 83–84 (in Russian).
  16. Schutz A. Self-presentational tactics of talk-show guests: A comparison of politicians, experts and entertainers. Journal of Psychology, 1998, vol. 132, no. 6, pp. 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01633.x
  17. Searle J. R., Vanderveken D. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge University Press, 1985. 227 p.
  18. ​Barkovich A. A., Ripinskaya O. A. Linguistic potential of corpus research of English-language environmental discourse. BSPU Bulletin. Seroes 1, Pedagigic. Psyhology. Philology, 2023, no. 2 (116), pp. 84–88 (in Russian). EDN: QJTKWH

 

Received: 
12.08.2024
Accepted: 
20.10.2024
Published: 
02.03.2026