International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Dziuba E. V., Ryabova I. Y. The category of dialogicality as realization of novel genre potential. Speech Genres, 2023, vol. 18, iss. 4 (40), pp. 349-357. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2023-18-4-40-349-357, EDN: DCZDVU

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 225)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
811.111’38’42+821.111-31+929Диккенс
EDN: 
DCZDVU

The category of dialogicality as realization of novel genre potential

Abstract: 

The category of discursive dialogicality is considered, represented in a literary text that exists on the border of two social discourses – literature and law. The semantic domain of the interdiscourse, as a heterogeneous linguosociocultural space in which two different discourses interact, is open, mobile and dialogically conditioned. The aim of the paper is to reconstruct the cooperative model of dialogical interaction of the stated discourses, i.e. such a model that allows a recipient to bring together two worldviews in the recipient’s mind: legal and artistic. The subject of the research is the implementation of the category of discursive dialogicality in a literary text with a dominant legal storyline, as well as the peculiarity of linguistic means and speechmaking techniques relevant for a social novel – the genre type that allows to reveal the inner dialogicality of formally monological statements, to expose social positions and worldviews. The category in question unites hierarchically organized types: pragma-dialogue (first level), auto-dialogue and dialogue-game (second level) which find expression at the intra-textual, extra-textual and intertextual levels of meaning generation. The category of discursive dialogicality in the novel “Bleak House” by Ch. Dickens is a complex system of several types of dialogicality in which the reader’s personality is formed. The convergence of two conceptual areas in the recipient’s mind – artistic and legal – is carried out at the level of integration of linguistic markers of legal discourse and units of artistic text, cooperation of conventional and individual author’s techniques of artistic expression with elements of official business style. In fact, novel genre displays the category of dialogicality in all its diversity.

Reference: 
  1. ABBYY Lingvo ×6 : English-Russian Electronic Dictionary. Moscow, 2014 (in Russian).
  2. Arnol’d I. V. Semantika. Stilistika. Intertekstual’nost’: sbornik statej [Semantics. Stylistics. Intertextuality : Coll. of arts]. Saint Petersburg, St. Petersburg University Publ., 1999. 444 p. (in Russian).
  3. Bakhtin M. M. Sobranie sochinenij. T. 3 : Teorija romana (1930–1961 gg.) [Collection of Works. Vol. 3 : Theory of Novel]. Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2012. 880 p. (in Russian).
  4. Bakhtin M. M. Tvorchestvo Fransua Rable i narodnaja kul’tura srednevekov’ja [Creative Works by François Rabelais and Folk Culture of Middle Ages]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1965. 545 p. (in Russian).
  5. Bakhtin M. M. Voprosy literatury i jestetiki. Issledovanija raznykh let [Issues of Literature and Aesthetics. Research of Different Years]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1975. 504 p. (in Russian).
  6. Chernjavskaja V. E. Intertext and interdiscourse as realization of textual openness. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2004, no. 1 (001), pp. 106–111 (in Russian).
  7. Dement’ev V. V. O About some content-centric tendencies in modern domestic linguistics. Journal Tomsk State University. Philology, 2021, no. 72, pp. 42–73 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/19986645/72/3
  8. Dementyev V. V. Intertextual Aspect of Speech Genres. Speech Genres, 2015, no. 2 (12), pp. 9–26 (in Russian).
  9. Dialogicheskaja lingvistika: kollektivnaja monografija [Dialogical Linquistics: Collective Monograph]. Barnaul, Altay State Pedagogical University Publ., 2019. 320 p. (in Russian).
  10. Dickens Ch. Bleak House I. Moscow, T8RUGRAM, Original, 2018. 812 p. (in Russian).
  11. Dziuba E. V. Methodological principles of cognitive research of lexical categorization. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2015, no. 2 (43), pp. 5–12.
  12. Dzjuba E. V., Ryabova I. Yu. Category of situationality in the narrative model of a literary-legal text. Scientific Dialogue, 2022, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 69–98 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2022-11-5-69-98
  13. Kvadratura smysla: Francuzskaja shkola analiza diskursa [Quadrature of Meaning: French School of Discourse Analysis]. Moscow, Progress, 1999. 416 p. (in Russian).
  14. Magnusson L. Shakespeare and social dialogue. Dramatic language and Elizabethan letters. Cambridge University Press, 2004. 233 p.
  15. Ot’e-Revju Zh. Explicit and Constitutive Heterogeneity : To the Problem of the Other in the Discourse. In: Kvadratura smysla: Francuzskaja shkola analiza diskursa [Quadrature of Meaning: French School of Discourse Analysis]. Moscow, Progress, 1999, pp. 54–94 (in Russian).
  16. Plekhanova T. F. Diskurs-analiz teksta : posobie dlja studentov [Discourse-analysis of the Text : Manual for Students]. Minsk, TetraSistems, 2011. 368 p. (in Russian).
  17. Serio P. How Texts Are Read in France. In: Kvadratura smysla: Francuzskaja shkola analiza diskursa [Quadrature of Meaning: French School of Discourse Analysis]. Moscow, Progress, 1999. 416 p. (in Russian).
  18. Vodak R. Jazyk, diskurs, politika [Language, Discourse, Politics]. Volgograd, Peremena, 1997. 139 p. (in Russian).
  19. Weigand E. Dialogue: The mixed game. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2010. 320 p.
  20. Weigand E. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Dialogue. New York, London, Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 2017. 391 p.
Received: 
09.09.2022
Accepted: 
27.11.2022
Published: 
30.11.2023