International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Mukhina Y. N. Sensory peculiarities of genres. Speech Genres, 2022, no. 3(17), pp. 168-175. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2022-17-3-35-168-175

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 119)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
81’373.4’42
EDN: 
HUWZAQ

Sensory peculiarities of genres

Autors: 
Mukhina Yulia Nikolaevna, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The article presents the interim results of the observation over sensory features of certain fiction and non-fiction genres (poem, academic article, lecture, oral conference presentation, guide book). The study of sensory features of the above-mentioned genres contributes, on the one hand, to the solution of a number of problems within sensory linguistics, such as the description of language resources, functions and genre-forming features of sensory vocabulary and its role in the comprehension of reality. On the other hand, the article complements the description of traditional genre-forming features. The analysis of sensory aspects of genres is carried out in two directions. The first direction implies collecting and systematisation of a particular language resources through reference to samples of fiction genres (e. g. poem and guide book), while the second one takes into account genre specificity, the sensory framing of which is linked with the categories of emotionalism, suggestion and evaluation (as exemplified by the samples of non-fiction genres of academic discourse, guide book and, partially, poem). In different types of discourse sensory cognition is realised in different ways. Lexically it takes the form of single words and phrases which semantically appeal to the sensory experience as well as the form of a sensory (perceptual) metaphor based on physical cognition and interfering with the emotional, cognitive and intellectual spheres. The range of modes of perception varies from a rich collection characteristic of fiction genres and appears to be in keeping with the traditional five-member model to modes corresponding to visual, hearing, tactile and body perceptions in non-fiction genres. The latter make it possible to trace links between inferential and sensory modes of perception.

 

Reference: 
  1. Arutjunova N. D. Jazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and Human World]. Moscow, Jazyki russkoj kul’tury Publ., 1999. 896 p. (in Russian).
  2. Atamanova N. V. The vocabulary of perception in the poetiv idiolect of A. K. Tolstoy. Bryansk State University Herald, 2017, no. 3 (33), pp. 183–192 (in Russian).
  3. Barinova E. E. Popular science literature in the classification of genres (theoretical and historic aspect). Siberian Journal of Philology, 2012, no. 3, pp. 120–128 (in Russian).
  4. Bezrukov A. N. Conversion in poetic communication of Afanasy Fet’s lyric poetry. Studia Humanitatis, 2018, no. 1. Available at : https://cyberleninka.ru/article/ n/konversiv-poeticheskoy-kommunikatsii-v-lirike-a-a-feta (accessed 10 June 2021) (in Russian).
  5. Dement’ev V. V. Teorija rechevyh zhanrov [Theory of Speech Genres]. Moscow, Znak Publ., 2010. 600 p. (in Russian).
  6. Harchenko V. K. Lingvosensorika : Fundamental’nye i prikladnye aspekty [Linguistic Sensory Studies: Fundamental and Applied aspects]. Moscow, Knizhnyj dom “LIBROKOM” Publ., 2012. 216 p. (in Russian).
  7. Janickaja N. I. Adjectival Synesthesia in English and Russian Romantic Poetry. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2010. 25 p. (in Russian).
  8. Krjukova L. B., Dvizova A. V. The semantic model of tactile perception and its realization in the poetry of B. Pasternak. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2011, no. 352, pp. 22–26 (in Russian).
  9. Krjukova L. B., Efimova S. I. Situation of perception and language features of its representation in modern journalistic text (“feature” genre, on the material of GEO and GEO traveller magazines). Text. Book. Publishing, 2013, № 1 (3), pp. 30–37 (in Russian).
  10. Ljapina L. E. Sensornaja pojetika v russkoj literature XIX veka [Sensory Poetics in Russian Literature of the XIX century]. Saarbrjukken, Palmarium. Academic Publishing, 2014. 168 p. (in Russian).
  11. Metlasova T. M. Sensory imagery in Robert Frost’s poetry. In: Pojeticheskij tekst v antropocentricheskoj nauchnoj paradigme : teorija, praktika, metodologija : materialy Mezhdunarodnogo festivalja nauki i tvorchestva “Dni pojezii” [Poetic Text in the Anthropocentric Paradigm: Theory, Practice and Methodology : Papers of International Festival “Poetry Days”]. Saratov, Saratovskij istochnik Publ., 2018, pp. 30–34 (in Russian).
  12. Muhina Ju. N. Lingvocultural peculiarities of sound perception representation in Russian and English poems. Aktual’nye problemy social’no-gumanitarnykh nauk i obrazovanija : sushhnost’, kontseptsii, perspektivy : materialy VII mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferentsii [Topical Issues of Social and Humanitarian Sciences and Education: Content, Conceptions, Perspectives: Papers of VII International Conference]. Saratov, Saratovskij istochnik Publ., 2019, pp. 549–554 (in Russian).
  13. Muhina Ju. N. Sensory features of scientific discourse. Kognitivnye issledovanija jazyka. Vyp. XXXVII : Integrativnye processy v kognitivnoj lingvistike : materialy Mezhdunarodnogo kongressa po kognitivnoj lingvistike. 16–18 maja 2019 g. [Cognitive Studies of Language. Vol. XXXVII : Integrative Processes in Cognitive Linguistics: Papers of International Congress on Cognitive Linguistics. May, 16–18, 2019]. Nizhnij Novgorod, DEKOM Publ., 2019, pp. 790–795 (in Russian).
  14. Muhina Ju. N. The effect of scientific and popular science discourse on the basic cognitive level. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, 2019, vol. 19, iss. 1, pp. 25–29 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1817-7115-2019-19-1-25-29
  15. Petrova A. V. Semantics and Functions of the Verbs of Perception in the Poetry of F. I. Tyutchev. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2018. 180 p. (in Russian).
  16. Rozanova Ju. N. Guide book as a genre of discourse : The diachronic aspect. Historical and SocialEducational, 2014, no. 5 (27), pp. 281–285 (in Russian).
  17. Stoller P. Sensuous Scholarship. Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997. 184 p.
  18. Ter-Minasova S. G. Great and Mighty or Global? Science and Life, 2014, no. 9, pp. 22–25 (in Russian).
Received: 
24.09.2021
Accepted: 
15.11.2021
Published: 
31.08.2022