International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Prozorov V. V. A lyrical discourse/text as a speech genre crossover. Speech Genres, 2021, no. 2(30), pp. 126-135. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2021-2-30-126-135

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 353)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
81'42
EDN: 
MZQOQX

A lyrical discourse/text as a speech genre crossover

Autors: 
Prozorov Valery Vladimirovich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The author of the article understands lyrical discourses/texts as holistic speech acts, generated by inflamed emotions and a wide range of strong emotional affects which are certainly essentially interactive by nature. The notion of an authocommunicative (in a broader sense – lyrical) speech genre crossover embraces literary and colloquial, primary and secondary speech genres in the form of monologues and dialogues. The permanent feature of all of them is their special insightful stylistic expressiveness. Internal speech, in case it is used by a competent user capable of creative figurative thinking, when addressed to the proper addressee turns from the thing in itself to the thing (discourse/text) for those who are entitled and those who know. The proper addressee is a desirable communicative and emotional category which in this case presupposes openness to those whose are ready for a thorough sincere internal dialogue with the given lyrically coloured speech act. Lyrical discourses/texs of a speech genre crossover may be characterized through the universal psychologicalsemantic triad of attention – joint participation – discovery. Absorbing selflessly into a lyrical text we wire up our attention to the original intonations of the author’s state of mind and mood. This is followed by a noticeably updated personal experience of the addressee, initiating new individual evaluative feelings, directly or indirectly related to the dynamics of the author’s intentions. Eventually, comes the final chord which is able to transfer the discovery of sensory and conceptual author’s intentions. The integral perception of perfect lyrical discourses/texts introduces us to numerous cultural practices of phatic and informational interactions invigoratingly influencing authocommunictive aptitudes of the person, which at long last facilitates their free emotional and intellectual enhancement.  

Reference: 
  1. Bahtin M. M. Sobranie sochinenij : v 7 t. T. 5. Raboty 1940–1960 godov [Collected Works : in 7 vols, vol. 5. Works of 1940–1960]. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., 1996, pp. 159–206 (in Russian).
  2. Dementyev V. V. Kommunikativnye tsennosti russkoj kul’tury. Kategoriya personal’nosti v leksike i pragmatike [Communicative Values of the Russian Culture. Category of Personality in Vocabulary and Pragmatics]. Moscow, Global Com. Publ., 2013. 336 p. (in Russian).
  3. Formanovskaya N. I. Kommunikativnyy kontakt [Communicative Contact]. Moscow, IKAR Publ., 2012. 200 p. (in Russian).
  4. Formanovskaya N. I. Rechevoy etiket v russkom obshchenii. Teoriya i praktika [Speech Etiquette in Russian Communication. Theory and Practice]. Moscow, VK Publ., 2009. 334 p. (in Russian).
  5. Goroshko Ye. I., Polyakova T. L. To the construction of a typology of social media genres. Speech Genres, 2015, no. 2 (12), pp. 119–127 (in Russian).
  6. Ivanyushina I. Yu. Russkiy futurizm : ideologiya, poetika, pragmatika [Russian Futurism : Ideology, Poetics, Pragmatics]. Saratov, Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2003. 312 p. (in Russian).
  7. Karasik V. I. Genres of Network Discourse. Speech Genres, 2019, no. 1 (21), pp. 49–55 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2019-1-21-49-55
  8. Karasik V. I. Poetic reflection in a comic miniature. Speech Genres, 2015, no. 1 (11), pp. 101–110 (in Russian).
  9. Lotman Yu. M. Autocommunication : “I” and “Other” as addressees : (about two models of communication in the cultural system). In: Lotman Yu. M. Semiosfera [Semiosphere]. Sain Petersburg, Iskusstvo Publ., 2000, pp. 159–164 (in Russian).
  10. Prozorov V. V. Typology of Speech Genres in Terms of Fiction-Writing Modes Theory. Speech Genres, 2017, no. 2 (16), pp. 142–150 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2017-2-16-142-150
  11. Sedov K. F. Obshchaya i antropotsentricheskaya lingvistika [General and Anthropocentric Linguistics]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul’tury Publ., 2016. 440 p. (in Russian).
  12. Skaftymov A. P. Poetika khudozhestvennogo proizvedeniya [Poetics of a Work of Art]. Moscow, Vusshaya shkola Publ., 2007. 536 p. (in Russian).
  13. Skvoznikov V. D. Lirika [Lyrics]. In: Teoriya literatury. Osnovnyye problemy v istoricheskom osveshchenii. Rody i zhanry literatury [Theory of Literature. Major Problems in Historical Coverage. Genera and Genres of Literature]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1964, pp. 173–237 (in Russian).
  14. Tarasova I. A. The genre of fragment in the poetry of the Paris note. Speech Genres, 2015, no. 1 (11), pp. 111–116 (in Russian).
Received: 
05.07.2020
Accepted: 
29.09.2020
Published: 
31.05.2021