International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)

For citation:

Sériot P. Is language a system of signs? (Lenin, Saussure and the theory of hieroglyphics). Speech Genres, 2023, vol. 18, iss. 4 (40), pp. 394-405. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2023-18-4-40-394-405, EDN: HMJOYA

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
download
(downloads: 655)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Translations
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
УДК 81’22+14
DOI: 
10.18500/2311-0740-2023-18-4-40-394-405
EDN: 
HMJOYA

Is language a system of signs? (Lenin, Saussure and the theory of hieroglyphics)

Autors: 
Sériot Patrick, University of Lausanne
Abstract: 

This paper strives to pursue two goals at the same time: – how can one get to know in depth the intellectual life of the Soviet Union in the 1930s–50s? – what can the virulent anti-Saussurean criticism in Russia at that time tell us about the specificity of the Marxist-Leninist theory of sign? We will propose here an apparently narrow angle of attack: the recurring theme of this criticism, namely that Saussure’s Cours presents a ”theory of hieroglyphics” (or symbols), therefore a type of bourgeois idealist theory that Lenin assailed in his 1909 book Materialism and Empiriocriticism about E. Mach, and which was upheld for a time by Plekhanov. But thinking about hieroglyphics is based on much older controversies, dating back to the 17th century about the deciphering of Egyptian writing. The issue which arises here is semiotic in nature: it is the scalar opposition between transparency and opacity of the sign that is at stake. Does the sign hide or reveal? The Soviet discourse on language and signs in the 1930s–50s seems entirely to be based on an interrogation of the sign/referent, language/thought, form/content relationship. A part of the history of semiotics can thus be discovered from the critique of the “hieroglyphic theory”, a little-known episode in a debate on the interpretation of Saussurism.

Key words: 
epistemology
hieroglyphics
Kant
Lenin
Soviet linguistics
Marxism
ontology
Saussure
theory of knowledge
Reference: 
  1. Albright D. Untwisting the Serpent. Chicago, London, The University of Chicago Press, 2000. 395 p.
  2. Althusser L. Lénine et la philosophie. Paris, Maspero, 1969. 60 р.
  3. Althusser L. Lire le Capital. Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1996 [1965].
  4. Bacon F. Of the Proficiency and Advancement of Learning Divine and Human. London, Henrie Tomes, 1605.
  5. BSE. Bol’shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya, t. 27 [Great Soviet Encyclopedia. Vol. 27]. Moscow, OGIZ, 1933 (in Russian).
  6. Budagov R. A. I. “Materialism and empiriocriticism” and Soviet linguistics. Izvestiya Akademii nauk SSSR, Otdeleniye literatury i yazyka [Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Department of Literature and Language], 1949, no. 6, pp. 509–521 (in Russian).
  7. Champollion Jean-François. Précis du système hiéroglyphique. Paris, Imprimerie royale, 1824. 510 p.
  8. Clauss S. John Wilkins’ Essay Toward a Real Character: Its Place in the Seventeenth-Century Episteme. Journal of the History of Ideas, 1982, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 531–553.
  9. Collier Mark, Manley Bill. How to Read Egyptian, A Step-by-step Guide to Teach Yourself. London, British Museum Press, 1998. 179 p.
  10. Comtet R. L’école phonologique de Léningrad et l’école phonologique de Moscou. Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 1995, vol. XVII, no. 2, pp. 183-210.
  11. Danilov G. K. Linguists of the West [F. Saussure. Course of general linguistics. Translation by A. Sukhotin, ed. and with note. R. Shore. Introductory article by N. Vvedensky. Sotsekgiz. Moscow, 1934]. Za kommunisticheskoye prosveshcheniye [For Communist Education], 26.09.1934, no. 222, pp. 3 (in Russian).
  12. Demonet M.-L. Les voix du signe. Nature et origine du langage à la Renaissance (1480–1580). Paris, Champion, 1992. 690 p.
  13. Dictionnaire Robert: en 9 vol., vol. 5. Paris, Robert, 1985.
  14. Diderot D. D’Alembert Jean Le Rond. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers. Paris, Chez Le Breton, imprimeur ordinaire du Roy, 1751. Available at: https://books.google.ch/books/about/Encyclopédie_Ou_Dictionnaire_Raisonné. html?id=z1SfZIAop_QC&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_ read_button&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
  15. Dubois C.-G. Mythe et langage au XVIe siècle. Bordeaux, Ducrot, 1970. 387 p.
  16. Du Ponceau Peter S. A Dissertation on the Nature and Character of the Chinese System of Writing, in a letter to John Vaughn, Esq. Philadelphia, American Philosophical Society, 1838.
  17. Eco U. The Search for the Perfect Language. London, Blackwell Publishing, 1995. 396 p.
  18. Filin F. P. The struggle for Marxist-Leninist linguistics and the Language Front group. In: Protiv burzhuaznoy kontrabandy v yazykoznanii. Pod red. S. Bykovskiy [Bykovskiy S., ed. Against bourgeois smuggling in linguistics]. Leningrad, GAIMK, 1932, pp. 28–46 (in Russian).
  19. Foucault M. The Order of Things. London, Tavistock, 1970. 387 p.
  20. G. Lenin’s criticism of the theory of hieroglyphs. Revolyutsiya i kul’tura [Revolution and Culture], 1930, no. 21–22, pp. 24–31 (in Russian).
  21. Josephson P. R. Physics and Politics in Revolutionary Russia. Berkeley, University of California Press, 1991. 330 р.
  22. Kelly A. «Empiriocriticism: A Bolshevik Philosophy?». Cahiers du Monde russe et soviétique, 1981, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 89–118.
  23. Kircher A. Obeliscus Pamphilius. Rome, Louis Grignan, 1650.
  24. Lavallard Marie-Hélène. La philosophie marxiste. Paris, Éditions sociales, 1982. 183 р.
  25. Lenin V. I. (under the pseudonym Vl. Il’in) Materializm i empiriokrititsizm. Kriticheskiye zametki ob odnoy reaktsionnoy filosofii [Materialism and empiriocriticism. Critical Notes on a Reactionary Philosophy]. Moscow, Zveno, 1909. 438 p. (in Russian). Available at: https://royallib.com/book/lenin_vladimir/materializm_i_empiriokrititsizm...
  26. Mach E. Die Analyse der Empfindungen und das Verhältnis des Physischen zum Psychischen. Jena, Gustav Fischer, 1886. 265 p.
  27. Mallarmé Stéphane. Crise de vers, in Divagations. Paris, Bibliothèque Charpentier, 1897.
  28. Marx K. Capital: A Critical Analysis of Capitalist Production. London, Swan Sonnenschein, Lowrey, & Co, 1887 [Engl. translation of Marx 1867].
  29. Marx K. Das Kapital, Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. Hamburg, Otto Meisner, 1867.
  30. Millet O. «Hiéroglyphes et allégories dans la première moitié du XVIe s.: de la reconfiguration humaniste de l’allégorisme». Revue d’histoire littéraire de la France, 2012, no. 2, pp. 263–276.
  31. O’Neil T. M. Ideography and Chinese Language Theory: A History. Berlin, Boston, Walter de Gruyter, 2016. 355 p.
  32. Panfilov E. D. Against the reactionary methodology of modern structuralism. Uchenyye zapiski 1-go Leningradskogo pedagogicheskogo instituta inostrannykh yazykov. Novaya seriya [Scientific notes of the 1st Leningrad Pedagogical Institute of Foreign Languages. New series], 1954, no. 1, pp. 246–258 (in Russian).
  33. Plekhanov G. V. Izbrannyye filosofskiye proizvedeniya: v 5 t. T. 1 [Selected Philosophical Works: in 5 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe izdatel’stvo politicheskoi literatury, 1956. 847 р. (in Russian).
  34. Reznikov L. O. Against agnosticism in linguistics (Criticism of the sign theory of language). Izvestiya Akademii nauk SSSR, Otdeleniye literatury i yazyka [Proceedings of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Department of Literature and Language], 1948, no. 5, pp. 401–417 (in Russian).
  35. Sériot Patrick. If Vico had read Engels he would be called Nikolai Marr, Interventions. International Journal of Postcolonial Studies, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2020.1784031 (Engl. transl. by Matthew Carson Allen). Available at: https://web.stanford.edu/davies/Symbsys100-Spring0708/Marx-Commodity-Fet...
  36. Serdyuchenko G. P. Old and new in the science of language. Na pod”yeme [On the rise], 1931, no. 4, pp. 156– 175 (in Russian).
  37. Shteynfel’dt E. Chastotnyy slovar’ sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo yazyka [Frequency dictionary of the modern Russian literary language]. Moscow, Progress, 1963, 316 p. (in Russian).
  38. Swift J. Gulliver’s Travels. London, Benj, Motte, 1726.
  39. Truchon L. Lénine épistémologue: Les thèses de Matérialisme et Empiriocriticisme et la constitution d’un matérialisme intégral. Paris, Delga, 2013. 216 р.
  40. Velmezova E. Le triomphe du structuralisme et le triomphe du “Cours de linguistique générale” en URSS dans les années 1950–1960. In: Bruno M. W., Chiricò D., Cimatti F., Cosenza G., De Marco A., Fadda E., Lo Feudo G., Mazzeo M., Stancati C. (a cura di). Linguistica e filosofia del linguaggio: Studi in onore di Daniele Gambarara. Milan, Mimesis, 2018, pp. 525–533.
  41. Zapata R. La philosophie russe et soviétique. Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1988. 127 р.
  42. Zapata R. Luttes philosophiques en U.R.S.S., 1922– 1931. Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 1983. 336 р.
Received: 
05.02.2022
Accepted: 
01.12.2022
Published: 
30.11.2023