International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Ermakova O. P. Indirect responses in natural conversation. Speech Genres, 2021, no. 3(31), pp. 181-189. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2021-3-31-181-189

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 337)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
811.161.1
EDN: 
DKVVOC

Indirect responses in natural conversation

Autors: 
Ermakova Olga Pavlovna, Kaluga State University named after K.E.Tsiolkovski
Abstract: 

By indirect answers we mean answers to general questions which do not correspond to “yes” and “no”, and answers to special questions which do not literally correlate with the question words who, what, where, etc. The article examines the types of indirect responses in different structural and semantic types of dialogue. The article analyzes the features of indirect answers determined by the predictive relationship of concepts: place-goal, place-time, etc. Particular attention is paid to answers containing assessment, not determineded by the content of questions, as well as question-answer turns with why and what for.
The article focuses on the informative volume of indirect answers, their insufficiency and redundancy. Indirect questions are used rather frequently. It is not possible to classify all of them, but all of them are undoubtedly associated with certain types of dialogue, speech genres, speech situations and with the psychological type of communication partners. As noted earlier, the logical connection of the categories place-goal, placetime, goal-cause, etc. leads to reversibility and predictability of situations, and in certain speech genres to the interchangeability of designating categories in the form of indirect answers.
A specific feature of the dialogue, observed in different speech genres, is the response containing the characteristic of the person mentioned in the question, instead of the information in which the speaker is interested. The analysis of these responses reveals the organic connection between the evaluation and the reason. The use of counter-questions, and first of all, why- and what for-remarks, is caused by the specific nature of this phenomenon, which, despite the thorough research of N. D. Arutyunova, allows to see some interesting features in it.
The article uses recordings of oral speech and some works of fiction, reproducing spoken dialogue.

Reference: 
  1. Arutyunova N. D. Assessment in the mechanism of life and language. In: Arutyunova N. D. Jazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the world of the human]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1999, pp. 130–274 (in Russian).
  2. Arutyunova N. D. Communication problems. In: Arutyunova N. D. Jazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the world of the human]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 1999, pp. 643–686 (in Russian).
  3. Arutyunova N. D. Some types of dialogical reactions and “why” – replicas in Russian. Filologicheskie nauki [Philological science], 1970, no. 3, pp. 44–58 (in Russian).
  4. Dementyev V. V. Speech genre picture of modernity (aspect of indirect communication). Russkiy yazyk segodnya. Vyp. 6 : Rechevyye zhanry sovremennogo obshcheniya : sb. dokladov ; otv. red. A. V. Zanadvorova [Zanadvorova A. V., ed. Russian language today. Iss. 6 : Speech genres of modern communication : coll. reports]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2015, pp. 62–73 (in Russian).
  5. Paducheva Ye. V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s deystvitel’nostyu [Utterance and its interrelationship with reality]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1985. 272 p. (in Russian).
  6. Razlogova Ye. E. Cognitive attitudes in direct and indirect answers to a question. In: Logicheskiy analiz yazyka : Problemy intensional’nykh i pragmaticheskikh kontekstov [Logical analysis of language : Problems of intensional and pragmatic contexts]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989, pp. 133– 154 (in Russian).
  7. Wolf Ye. M. Funktsional’naya semantika otsenki [Functional semantics of evaluation]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1985, 228 p. (in Russian).
  8. Wolf Ye. M. Grammatika i semantika mestoimeniy [Grammar and semantics of pronouns]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1974. 224 p. (in Russian).
  9. Wolf Ye. M. Grammatika i semantika prilagatel’nogo (na materiale iberoromanskikh yazykov) [Grammar and semantics of the adjective (based on the Ibero-Romance languages)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 200 p. (in Russian).
  10. Yermakova O. P., Zemskaya Ye. A. Towards the construction of a typology of communicative failures. In: Russkiy yazyk v yego funktsionirovanii. Kommunikativnopragmaticheskiy aspekt [Russian language in its functioning. Communicative and pragmatic aspect]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993, pp. 36–64 (in Russian).
  11. Yermakova O. P. An attempt at typology of indirect answers. Russkiy yazyk segodnya. Vyp. 5. X Shmelevskiye chteniya. Problemy rechevogo obshcheniya [Russian language today. Iss. 5. X Shmelev Readings. Problems of verbal communication]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2012, pp. 156–169 (in Russian).
  12. Yermakova O. P. Convertibility “where” and “why” in Russian. In: Logicheskiy analiz yazyka. Yazyki dinamicheskogo mira [Logical analysis of language. Languages of the dynamic world]. Dubna, Mezhdunar. un-t prirody, obshchestva i cheloveka “Dubna”, 1999, pp. 36–42 (in Russian).
Received: 
05.11.2020
Accepted: 
23.03.2021
Published: 
30.08.2021