International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)

For citation:

Dubrovskaya T. V. Genre «letter in the pack»: discursive construction of the addresser and the addressee. Speech Genres, 2016, no. 1(13), pp. 128-136. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2016-1-13-128-136

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 304)
Article type: 

Genre «letter in the pack»: discursive construction of the addresser and the addressee

Dubrovskaya Tatiana Victorovna, Penza State University

The paper focuses on the commercial genre «letter in the pack», specifically on the discursive construction of the addresser and the addressee. Methodologically, the author draws on speech genre theory and social constructionism to demonstrate how the categorized and typified personal experience of the addresser is transmitted onto the addressee and how this results in the construction of the axiologically charged system «addresser – addressee». The analytical model embraces the consideration of illocutionary force in the context of social practices, representations and discursive techniques used to construct the addresser and the addressee, as well as the addresser’s axiological views that are embodied in the genre. The analysis reveals that the genre mixes social practices and the relations «addresser – addressee» are constructed in axiological – not commercial – terms. Following similar axiological principles predetermines the representation of the addresser and addressee as belonging to the «us» – group. The author also claims that social constructionism and speech genre theory can be integrated to explore the linguistic ways employed to represent and interpret social reality.


1. Shmelyova T. V. Model rechevogo zhanra [Model of speech genre]. Zhanry rechi: sb. nauch. tr. [Speech genres: collection of scientific works. Ed. by V. E. Goldin]. Iss. 1. Saratov, 1997, pp. 88–98.

2. Bakhtin M. M. Problema rechevykh zhanrov [The problem of speech genres]. Estetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [Esthetics of verbal art. 2nd ed.]. Moscow, 1986, pp. 250–296.

3. Kozhemyakin Y. A. Diskursnyj podkhod k izucheniju institutsionalnoj kultury [Discursive approach in the studies of institutional culture]. Belgorod, 2008. 244 p.

4. Berger P., Luckmann Th. Sotsialnoje konstruirovanie realnosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znanija [The social construction of reality. The treatise in the sociology of knowledge]. Moscow, 1995. 323 p.

5. Ulanovsky A. M. Teorija rechevykh aktov i sotsianyj konstruktsionism [Speech act theory and social constructionism]. Postneklassicheskaja psikhologija. Sotsialnyj konstruktsionizm i narrativnyj podkhod [Post-non-classic psychology. Social constructionism and narrative approach]. 2004, no. 1, pp. 88–98. Available at: (accessed 07 April 2016)

6. Ulanovsky A. M. Konstruktivistskaya paradigm v gumanitarnykh naukakh [Constructivist paradigm in the humanities]. Epistemologija i folosofija nauki [Epistemology and philosophy of science]. 2006, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 129–141.

7. Derevyanko A. V. Paradigma konstruirovanija v sovremennoj zapadnoj gumanistike i dialogicheskij podkhod k yazyku M.M. Bakhtina (analiticheskij obzor) [Constructive paradigm in the modern Western humanities and M.M. Bakhtin’s dialogical approach to language (analytical overview)]. Trudy po psikhologicheskomu konsultirovaniju i psikhoterapii [Papers in counselling and psychotherapy]. 2005. Available at: cppp/2005/index.shtml (accessed 07 April 2016)

8. Gorbachjova E. N. Strategicheskaya informativnost v politicheskom diskurse [Strategic informativity in political discourse]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political linguistics]. 2015, no. 3(53), pp. 102–106.

9. Yaroslavtseva Y. A., Dubrovskaya T. V. Konstruirovanije mezhnatsionalnykh otnoshenij v zhanrakh vneshnepoliticheskogo diskursa (na primere Rossii i Soedinennykh Shtatov Ameriki) [Constructing international relations in the genres of foreign policy discourse in Russia nad the USA]. Politicheskaya lingvistika [Political linguistics]. 2015, no. 3(53), pp. 182–191.

10. Van Leeuwen T. The Representation of Social Actors. Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Eds. C. R. Caldas-Coulthard, M. Coulthard. London, 2003, pp. 32–70.

11. Fairclough N. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London, New York, 2004. 270 p.

12. Dementyev V. V. Problemu nepryamoj kommunikatsii [Problems of indirect communication]. Pryamaya i nepryamaya kommunikatsija: sb. nauch. statej [Direct and indirect communication: collection of research papers]. Saratov, 2003, pp. 5–16.

13. Ivin A. A. Sovremennaya aksiologija: nekotoryje aktualnyje problemy [Modern axiology: some topical issues]. Filosofskij zhurnal [Journal of Philosophy]. 2010, no. 1, pp. 66–78.

14. Sedov K. F. Anatomija zhanrov bytovogo obschenija [Anatomy of genres in everyday communication]. Voprosy stilistiki [Issues of stylistics]. Vol. 27. Chelovek i text [Human and text]. Saratov, 1998, pp. 9–20.