International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Sériot P. Barthes and Lotman: Ideology vs culture. Speech Genres, 2022, vol. 17, iss. 3 (35), pp. 176-185. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2022-17-3-35-176-185, EDN: EOTZAI

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 462)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
81’22’27
EDN: 
EOTZAI

Barthes and Lotman: Ideology vs culture

Autors: 
Sériot Patrick, University of Lausanne
Abstract: 

Despite both being great names in semiotics, Roland Barthes and Juri Lotman have more differences than they share similarities – not only because of their different political and historico-cultural environments, but also because they do not have the same object of study: it is ‘ideology’ for Barthes, and ‘culture’ for Lotman. Thus, there is no intellectual common ground between them, yet comparing them can lead us to a more important question: what is semiotics, and what has structuralism to do with it. The contrast between the two researchers is striking: Barthes, with leftist convictions in a capitalist country, published in Marxist publications, and risked nothing; Lotman, a specialist in Pushkin, had his apartment searched by KGB officers. In the name of semiotics, Bart fought against the alienation of social consciousness, against the oppression of free thought by bourgeois ideology, Lotman tried with all his might to adhere to a high elite culture. Both were subject to constant criticism from conservative forces, both promoted semiotics as a science of the modern era. But the same word, “society”, had incompatible meanings for them: for Barthes it represented a split association of opposing classes, for Lotman it had a romantic flavor of cultural integrality based on a common literary language and literature. Although we do not find a definition of structuralism in any of them, this comparison reveals unexpected aspects of the history of this important trend in the humanities and social sciences, both in France and in the Soviet Union.

Reference: 
  1. Arnauld A., Nicole P. La Logique ou l’art de penser. Paris, Charles Savreux, 1662.
  2. Arnauld A., Nicole P. Logika, ili Iskusstvo myslit’. Rus. per. V. P. Gaydamaka s poslesloviyem A. L. Subbotina po izdaniyu 1752 g. [Logic, or the Art of Thinking. Russ. transl. V. P. Gaidamak with an afterword by A. L. Subbotin according to the edition of 1752]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991. 413 p. (in Russian).
  3. Avtonomova N. S. Otkrytaya struktura. Yakobson – Bakhtin – Lotman – Gasparov [Open Structure. Jacobson – Bakhtin – Lotman – Gasparov]. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2009. 502 p. (in Russian).
  4. Barthes R. Leçon. Paris, Seuil, 1977.
  5. Barthes R. Le Grain de la voix : Entretiens 1962– 1980. Paris, Seuil, 1981. 352 p.
  6. Barthes R. Mif segodnya [Myth Today]. Barthes R. Izbrannyye raboty : Semiotika. Poetika [Selected Works : Semiotics : Poetics]. Moscow, Progress, Univers Publ., 1994, pp. 72–130 (in Russian).
  7. Barthes R. Mythologies. Paris, Seuil, 1957. 239 p.
  8. Bourdieu P. Ce que parler veut dire. Paris, Fayard, 1982. 248 p.
  9. Eagleton T. Ideology : An Introduction. London, Verso, 1991. 242 p.
  10. Frank-Kamenetsky I. G. Primitive thinking in the light of Japhetic theory and philosophy. Yazyk i literatura. T. III [Language and Literature. Vol. III]. Leningrad, Academy of Scince of the USSR, 1929, pp. 70–155 (in Russian).
  11. Gasparov M. L. Lotman and Marxism. Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye [New Literary Review], 1996, no. 19, pp. 7–13 (in Russian).
  12. Kristeva J. La sémiologie comme science des idéologies. Semiotica, 1969, no. 1, pp. 196–204.
  13. Kristeva J. On Yury Lotman. PMLA, 1994, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 375–376.
  14. Laferriere D. Of semioticians and slavists. Semiotic Scene, 1977, no. 4, pp. 28–32.
  15. Laferriere D. Semiotica sub specie sovietica : AntiFreudianism, pro-Marrism, and other disturbing matters. PTL : A Journal for Descriptive Poetics and Theory of Literature, 1978, no. 3, pp. 437–454.
  16. Landolt E. Histoire d’un dialogue impossible : J. Kristeva, J. Lotman et la sémiotique. Langage et société, 2012, no. 142, pp. 121–140.
  17. Lotman Y. M., Uspenskiy B. A. Myth – name – culture. Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Proceedings on Sign Systems], 1973, no. 6, pp. 282–303 (in Russian).
  18. Lotman Y. M. About two models of communication in the system of culture. Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Proceedings on Sign Systems], 1973, no. 6, pp. 227–243 (in Russian).
  19. Lotman Y. M. Karamzin’s poetry. In: Karamzin N. M. Stikhotvorenniya. (Biblioteka poeta, 2-e izd.) [Karamzin N. M. Poems. (Poet’s Library, 2nd ed.) ]. Leningrad, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1966, pp. 5–51 (in Russian).
  20. Lotman Y. M. Literary criticism should be a science. Voprosy literatury [Topics in the Study of Literature]. 1967, no. 1, pp. 90–100 (in Russian).
  21. Lotman Y. M. O. M. Freidenberg as a researcher of culture. Trudy po znakovym sistemam [Proceedings on Sign Systems], 1973, no. 6, pp. 482–489 (in Russian).
  22. Lotman Y. M. On the delimitation of the linguistic and literary concept of structure. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Topics in the Study of Language], 1963, no. 3, pp. 44–52 (in Russian).
  23. Lotman Y. M. Pis’ma [Letters]. Moscow, Languages of Russian culture, 1997. 787 p. (in Russian).
  24. Meschonnic H. Préface. In : Lotman Iouri. La structure du texte artistique. Paris, Gallimard, 1973, p. 11–13.
  25. Saussure Ferdinand de. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris, Payot, 1967 [1916]. 331 p.
  26. Saussure Ferdinand de. Kurs obshchey lingvistiki [Course of General Linguistics]. Yekaterinburg, Izd-vo Ural. un-ta, 1999. 425 p. (in Russian).
  27. Waldstein M. The Soviet Empire of Signs : A History of the Tartu School of Semiotics. Saarbrücken, VDM, 2008. 219 p.
Received: 
12.10.2021
Accepted: 
08.12.2021
Published: 
31.08.2022