International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Karabykov A. V. Anathema: Transformation of the genre in the secular and postsecular eras. Speech Genres, 2022, vol. 17, iss. 4 (36), pp. 262-271. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2022-17-4-36-262-271, EDN: VFFBTK

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 279)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
811.161.1’27
EDN: 
VFFBTK

Anathema: Transformation of the genre in the secular and postsecular eras

Autors: 
Karabykov Anton Vladimirovich, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal university
Abstract: 

The purpose of the article is to give an outline of those multilateral changes which the speech genre of anathema has undergone in Russian culture of the XIX–XXI centuries, and to shed light on the causes of these changes. Since anathema belongs to sacred performatives, whose pragmatic success directly depends on a set of metaphysical views peculiar to the Middle Ages, the fate of their entire subsystem in the conditions of global spiritual shifts of Modern and Postmodern eras is traced by means of an example of that genre. It is proved that, although anathema has not gone out of use in the Russian Church, it has undergone genre conservation in one direction and hybridization in another, as well as a serious theological rethinking. This latter process began after the excommunication of Leo Tolstoy (1901), the event that had an extraordinary resonance in the early twentieth century. In connection with it, “The Definition of the Holy Synod” is analyzed. It was the main performative which created that event and became a new milestone in the genre history of the Russian-Orthodox anathema. It is shown that this, as well as subsequent documents of that type, were determined in its genre specificity by the contemporary worldview context, the memory of the genre and a number of secondary factors. 

Acknowledgments: 
Работа выполнена при поддержке Российского фонда фундаментальных исследований (РФФИ), проект № 20-011-00622 «Философия как действие: прагматика текстового поведения». Research for this work was supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR), project № 20-011-00622 “Philosophy as action: the pragmatics of textual conduct”.
Reference: 
  1. Afanasʹev N. Joining the Church. In: Shmeman A. Vodoiu i dukhom [With water and spirit] Afanasʹev N. Vstuplenie v Tserkovʹ [Joining the Church]. Moscow, Pravoslavnyi Sviato-Tikhonovskii gumanitarnyi universitet, 2004, pp. 194–445 (in Russian).
  2. Arutʹunova N. D. Performatives. In: Iazykoznanie: Bolʹshoi еntsiklopedicheskii slovarʹ [Linguistics: The Large Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Bolʹshaia Rossiiskaia еntsiklopediia Publ., 1998, pp. 372–373 (in Russian).
  3. Aurelius Augustinus. De correptione et gracia liber unus. In: S. Aurelii Augustini. Opera omnia. Editio Latina. PL 44. Available at: https://www.augustinus.it/latino/correzione_grazia/index.htm (accessed 16 August 2021).
  4. Austin J. L. How to do things with words. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1962. 166 p.
  5. Basinskii P. V. Lev Tolstoi: Svobodnyi chelovek [Leo Tolstoy: A Free Man]. Moscow, Molodaia gvardiia Publ., 2017. 302 p. (in Russian).
  6. Beneshevich V. N. Drevneslavianskaia kormchaia XIV titulov bez tolkovanii. T. 2 [Old Slavic kormchaia of XIV titles without interpretations. Vol. 2]. Sofiia, Bolgarskaia AN Publ., 1987. 308 p. (in Russian).
  7. Blazhennyi Feodorit. Istoriia bogolʹubtsev, ili povestvovanie o sviatykh podvizhnikakh [The history of the God-lovers, or the narrative of the holy hermits]. Moscow, Palomnik Publ., 1996. 233 p. (in Russian).
  8. Caputo J. How the Secular World Became PostSecular. In: Caputo J. On Religion. London, New York, Routledge, 2001, pp. 37–66.
  9. Chekhov A. P. Letter to N. P. Kondakov. Chekhov A. P. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 30 t. Pisʹma: v 12 t. T. 9 [Complete Collected Works: in 30 vols. Letters: in 12 vols, vol. 9]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1950, pp. 213 (in Russian).
  10. Chumakova T. New Russian Middle Ages. Otechestvennye Zapiski, 2013, no. 1 (52), pp. 228–238 (in Russian).
  11. Decision of the Holy Synod, dated February 20–22, 1901 № 557, with a message to the faithful children of the Orthodox Greek Church about Count Leo Tolstoy. Tserkovnyia vedomosti, izdavaemyia pri Sviateishem Pravitelʹstvuiushchem Sѵnode. no. 8. 24 Fevralia 1901 goda [Ecclesiastical Gazettes published under the Holy Governing Synod. No. 8. February 24, 1901]. Saint Petersburg, Sѵnodalʹnaia Tipografiia, 1901, pp. 45–47. Available at: http://tolstoylit.ru/tolstoy/document/opredelenie-svyatejshego-sinoda.htm (accessed 20 September 2021) (in Russian).
  12. Firsov S. L. Tserkovʹ v Imperii. Ocherki iz tserkovnoi istorii еpokhi Imperatora Nikolaia II [Church in the Empire. Essays from the Church History of the Era of Emperor Nicholas II]. Moscow, Derzhava, Satis Publ., 2007. 460 p. (in Russian).
  13. Gavriushin N. K. “Menia ofitsialʹno provozglasili nepravoslavnym”: arkhiepiskop Nikanor (Brovkovich) [“I was officially declared non-Orthodox”: Archbishop Nicanor (Brovkovich)]. Available at: https://minds.by/news/menyaofitsial-no-provozglasili-nepravoslavny-m-arh... (accessed 19 October 2021) (in Russian).
  14. Ioann Shakhovskoi, arkhim. Tolstoi i Tserkovʹ [Tolstoy and the Church]. Berlin, Ikhtis, 1939. 203 p. (in Russian).
  15. Ioann Zlatoust. The sermon about anathema (curse). In: Chto takoe anafema [What is anathema]. Moscow, Izdatelʹstvo “DAR”, 2006, pp. 215–229 (in Russian).
  16. Iosif Volotskii, prep. Prosvetitelʹ [Enlightener]. Moscow, Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii Publ., 2011. 432 p. (in Russian).
  17. Karabykov A. V. Cultural and communicational mechanism and forms of realization of performativity in history of culture. Diss. Dr. Sci. (Philol.). Tomsk, 2014. 347 p. (in Russian).
  18. Karabykov A. V. Logos i glagol. Simvol, slovo, rechevoe deistvie v kulʹture khristianskogo Srednevekovʹia [Logos and verb. Symbol, word, speech action in the culture of the Christian Middle Ages]. Saint Petersburg, ITs “Gumanitarnaia akademiia”, 2013. 352 p. (in Russian).
  19. Kaverin R., arkhim. On the anathema. In: Chto takoe anafema [What is anathema]. Moscow, Izdatelʹstvo “DAR”, 2006, pp. 311–316 (in Russian).
  20. Kuraev A., diak. What does an excommunication mean. In: Chto takoe anafema [What is anathema]. Moscow, Izdatelʹstvo “DAR”, 2006, pp. 245–311 (in Russian).
  21. Maksimovich K. A. Anathema. In: Pravoslavnaia еntsiklopediia. T. 2 [The Orthodox Encyclopedia, vol. 2]. Moscow, Tserkovno-nauchnyi tsentr Russkoi Pravoslavnoi Tserkvi “Pravoslavnaia еntsiklopediia”, 2001, pp. 274–279 (in Russian).
  22. Metropolitan Anthony’s Reply to Countess S. A. Tolstaia. In: P. Palamarchuk, comp. Anafema. Istoriia i XX vek [Anathema. History and the twentieth century]. Moscow, Izdatelʹstvo Sretenskogo monastyria, 1998, pp. 293–295 (in Russian).
  23. Nikitin V. Excommunication. In: P. Palamarchuk (sost.). Anafema. Istoriia i XX vek [P. Palamarchuk, comp. Anathema. History and the twentieth century]. Moscow, Izdatelʹstvo Sretenskogo monastyria, 1998, pp. 297–309 (in Russian).
  24. Orekhanov G., prot. Lev Tolstoi. “Prorok bez chesti”: khronika katastrofy [Leo Tolstoy. “The Prophet Without Honor”: A Chronicle of the Catastrophe]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2016. 608 p. (in Russian).
  25. Rozanov V. V. L. N. Tolstoy and the Russian Church. In: Isupov K. G., comp. L. N. Tolstoi: pro et contra. Antologiia [L. N. Tolstoy: Pro et contra. Anthology]. Saint Petersburg, Izdatelʹstvo RKhGA, 2000, pp. 426–436 (in Russian).
  26. Rozanov V. V. On L. Tolstoy’s Excommunication from the Church. In: Rozanov V. V. Religiia. Filosofiia. Kulʹtura [Religion. Philosophy. Culture]. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1992, pp. 290–291 (in Russian).
  27. Sukhotin M. S. Leo Tolstoy. In: Makashin S. A., red. Literaturnoe nasledstvo. T. 69. Kn. 2 [Makashin S. A., ed. Literary legacy, vol. 69, book 2]. Moscow, AN SSSR Publ., 1961, pp. 141–236 (in Russian).
  28. The act of excommunication of Gleb Pavlovich Yakunin. In: P. Palamarchuk (sost.) Anafema. Istoriia i XX vek [P. Palamarchuk, comp. Anathema. History and the twentieth century]. Moscow, Izdatelʹstvo Sretenskogo monastyria, 1998, pp. 398–399 (in Russian).
  29. Tolstoi L. N. Response to the Synod’s decision of February 20–22 and to the letters I received on this occasion. Tolstoi L. N. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii: v 90 t. T. 34 [Complete works: 90 vol. Vol. 34]. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaia literatura Publ., 1952, pp. 245–253 (in Russian).
  30. Ukaz zapreshchennomu v sviashchennosluzhenii sviashchenniku Vasiliiu Andreevichu Vremia [Decree to the priest Vasily Andreevich Vremʹa forbidden in serving]. Available at: http://cerkva.kharkov.ua/novini/ukr/836.html (accessed 26 September 2021) (in Russian).
Received: 
02.11.2021
Accepted: 
15.01.2022
Published: 
30.11.2022