International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Mkrtytchian S. V., Lebedeva A. A. CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION as a speech genre of the nuclear zone of the Russian legislative discourse. Speech Genres, 2025, vol. 20, iss. 4 (48), pp. 388-397. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2025-20-4-48-388-397, EDN: IJCUCH

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 48)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
342.4(470+571):811.161.1’38’42
EDN: 
IJCUCH

CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION as a speech genre of the nuclear zone of the Russian legislative discourse

Autors: 
Mkrtytchian Svetlana Viktorovna, Tver State University
Lebedeva Alina Alekseevna, Tver State University
Abstract: 

The CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION is the main speech genre of the nuclear zone of the Russian legislative discourse, which by the criterion of legal force takes the central place in the system of legal discourse and is crucial for the formation of the “linguistic legal consciousness” of our society. The premise of modeling is the notion of the legislative discourse, which is understood as a hierarchically arranged system generalized through speech genres of normative legal act texts. According to the legal classification of normative legal acts of the federal level, the nuclear zone of the Russian legislative discourse is constituted by the following speech genres: CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, International Treaty, International Convention, International Agreement, Federal Law, Federal Code, Decree of the President of the Russian Federation, Resolution of the Government of the Russian Federation. The CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION occupies a special place and enters the nuclear zone of the first order due to a number of specific speech-genre features: 1) the nomination of the Russian Federation has evaluative and anthropomorphic character, which was established on the basis of an anthropometric study; 2) the image of the Author/Addressee in the CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION is convergent, which is manifested in autodialogy. The term convergent is interpreted as convergence or coincidence of two or more entities. The cumulative image of the Author/Addressee correlates with the CITIZEN – STATE opposition, which has a genre-forming potential and shows a “portrait in the background”; 3) dictum, associated with the concept of social contract and realized by means of deontic modality, reflects the function of persuasion (according to V. V. Vinogradov); 4) axiological character of the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation is explicated through the use of ameliorative lexicon, which is not characteristic of a typical manifestation of the official business functional style.

Reference: 
  1. Akhmanova O. S. Slovar’ lingvisticheskikh terminov. 2-e izd., ster. [Dictionary of linguistic terms, 2nd ed., ster.]. Moscow, URSS, Editorial URSS, 2004. 571 p. (in Russian).
  2. Balamakova A. V. Communicative and Pragmatic Interpretation of Questioning Intonation in Oral Legal Discourse (on the Material of American English). Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Ivanovo, 2010. 23 p. (in Russian).
  3. Balashova L. V., Dementyev V. V. Russkiye rechevyye zhanry [Russian speech genres] (Studia Philologica). Moscow, LRC Publishing House, 2022. 832 p. (in Russian).
  4. Constitution of the Russian Federation 2020 with Commentary. Available at: http://constitutionrf.ru/ (accessed March 1, 2024) (in Russian).
  5. Dubrovskaya T. V. Judicial Discourse: Speech Behavior of a Judge. Thesis Diss. Doct. Sci. (Philol.). Saratov, 2010. 40 p. (in Russian).
  6. Karasik V. I. About discourse categories. In: Yazykovaya lichnost’: sotsiolingvisticheskii i emotivnyi aspekty: sb. nauch. tr. Otv. red. V. I. Karasik [Karasik V. I., ed. Language Personality: Sociolinguistic and Emotive Aspects: Coll. of sci. arts]. Volgograd, Peremena, 1998, pp. 185–196 (in Russian).
  7. Khomutova T. N., Shefer E. A. Legal discourse: Problems and perspectives of research. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Series: Linguistics, 2019, vol. 16, iss. 3, pp. 44–53 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.14529/ling190308
  8. Kolesnikova L. V. Legal Discourse as a Result of Categorization and Conceptualization of Reality (on the Material of the Subject Terminological Field “Private International law”. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Stavropol, 2007. 19 p. (in Russian).
  9. Konovalova M. V. Global Categories of Coherence and Intertextuality in Legal Discourse. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Chelyabinsk, 2008. 25 p. (in Russian).
  10. Kosonogova O. V. Legal Discourse: Linguopragmatics of the proper name. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. Moscow, Moscow University for the Humanities Publ., 2008, iss. 2, pp. 188–192 (in Russian).
  11. Lebedeva N. B. Russian natural written language: Problems and tasks of laboratory research. In: Aktual’nye problemy rusistiki: sb. Otv. red. T. A. Demeshkina [Demeshkina T. A., ed. Current Issues in Russian Language Studies]. Tomsk, Tomsk State University Publ., 2000, pp. 257–263 (in Russian).
  12. Maltseva V. A. Strategies of Speech Influence in Professional Communication (on the Example of Legal Discourse). Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Chelyabinsk, 2011. 25 p. (in Russian).
  13. Nikishina O. A. Analysis of the English-speaking Penitentiary Discourse in the Aspect of the Realization of the Language of Power and the Language of Resistance. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Pyatigorsk, 2017. 23 p. (in Russian).
  14. Ovchinnikova N. V. Communicative and Pragmatic Specificity of Judicial Discourse. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Tver, 2006. 18 p. (in Russian).
  15. Petruk K. A. Semantic and Syntactic Characteristics of the Speech Genre “Disclamation” in the English-speaking Legal Discourse. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Volgograd, 2007. 18 p. (in Russian).
  16. Popova L. E. Legal Discourse as an Object of Interpretations (Semantic and Pragmatic Aspect). Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Krasnodar, 2005. 20 p. (in Russian).
  17. Shmeleva T. V. Model of speech genre. Zhanry rechi: sb. nauch. st. [Speech Genres: Coll. of sci. arts]. Saratov, GosUNTs “Kolledzh”, 1997, iss. 1, pp. 88–98 (in Russian).
  18. Sociological Dictionary. Available at: https:// sociological_dictionary.academic.ru (accessed March 1, 2024) (in Russian).
  19. Sternin J. A. Lexicographic and experimental description of language meaning. Journal of Psycholinguistics, 2022, iss. 1 (51), pp. 112–121 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30982/2077-5911-2022-51-1-112-121
  20. Stylistic Encyclopedic Dictionary of the Russian Language. Available at: https://stylistics.academic.ru/ (accessed March 1, 2024) (in Russian).
  21. Zaytseva V. V. Cognitive, Communicative Pragmatic and Linguistic Features of Interrogation in Legal Discourse. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Tambov, 2011. 24 p. (in Russian).
Received: 
27.03.2024
Accepted: 
14.05.2024
Published: 
28.11.2025