International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Avdevnina O. Y. A. Y. Vyshinsky’s prosecution statements: The specifics of the genre, interpretation of oratorical style. Speech Genres, 2026, vol. 21, iss. 3 (51), pp. 282-296. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2026-21-3-51-282-296, EDN: XDCBCS

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 101)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
811.161.1’38’42:343+929Вышинский
EDN: 
XDCBCS

A. Y. Vyshinsky’s prosecution statements: The specifics of the genre, interpretation of oratorical style

Autors: 
Avdevnina Ol'ga Yur'yevna, Saratov State Law Academy
Abstract: 

The article is devoted to the analysis of such a specific genre of legal literature as prosecution statement. The relevance of study is determined by the lack of an integrated approach to the study of the trial speech in linguistics. Both general methods of linguistic research (for example, functional-linguistic, stylistic, speech science, communicative) and integral methods meeting the goals and objectives of different scientific disciplines (such as logic, law, sociology, rhetoric) can be applied to the study. The purpose of the study is, firstly, to characterize the genre of the prosecution statement from the point of view of legal requirements for the speech of the prosecutor and traditions of court speaking, and secondly, to consider the linguistic means of implementing such rhetorical parameters as logos, ethos and pathos using the example of specific speeches. Since the oratorical style of A. Ya. Vyshinsky is characterized primarily by bright, historically marked, ideologically colored pathos, the main attention in the article is focused on the analysis of the content and linguistic organization of the pathos of speech both in Vyshinsky’s oratorical style and in general theoretical terms. The article suggests the following directions for reconstructing pathos: analysis of the speaker’s selfreflection, ethical and ideological conditionality of emotions demonstrated in speech; the individual pathos of the speaker is considered in the context of the time. A specific structural feature of a prosecution statement is the inclusion of characteristics of participants in the trial, which is mandatory for this genre. In speeches of Vyshinsky, characteristics of a defendant correlate with the prosecution strategy and pathos. From the point of view of selection of linguistic means for speech portraiture, these characteristics are close to the formation of images of characters in works of art, therefore, they can and should, in the opinion of the author of the article, be studied with the use of linguapoetics methods. The author comes to the conclusion that the main factor in the formation of the style and linguistic features of Vyshinsky’s prosecution statements is the historical and political context of his speeches.

Reference: 
  1. Avdevnina O. Yu., Devyatkina V. V. Courtroom speeches of Soviet prosecutors: Problems of rhetorical, cultural, speech, and stylistic continuity. In: Myakshev A. P., ed. The phenomenon of the multinational Soviet Union: History, heritage and social memory. To the 100th anniversary of the formation of the USSR: Materials of the international scientific conference (Saratov, October 14–15, 2022). Saratov, Saratovskiy istochnik, 2023, pp. 194–201 (in Russian).
  2. Avdevnina O. Yu. Case (genre, concept, word) in legal sphere’s anthropology. Speech Genres, 2018, no. 2 (18), pp. 127–135 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2018-2-18-127-135
  3. Bachaliashvili O. V. Argumentation as a speech act in judicial discourse. Pushkin Leningrad State University Journal, 2013, iss. 4, vol. 1, pp. 169–175 (in Russian).
  4. Bezlepkin B. T. Kommentariy k Ugolovnoprotsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) [Commentary on the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (article by article)]. Moscow, Prospekt, 2014. 560 p. (in Russian).
  5. Devyatkina V. V. Sudebnaya ritorika: uchebnoye posobiye [Judicial rhetoric: A textbook]. Saratov, ITs “Nauka”, 2013. 180 p. (in Russian).
  6. Esina A. S., Semenenko M. E. Kharakteristika funktsii prokurora – gosudarstvennogo obvineniya [Characteristics of the function of the prosecutor – state prosecution]. Available at: https://studfile.net/preview/1771356/ (accessed November 15, 2022) (in Russian).
  7. Krapivkina O. A. Dialectical interaction of argumentation and manipulation in judicial discursive practices. Philology. Theory & Practice, 2018, no. 12 (90), pt 1, pp. 130–134 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30853/filnauki.2018.12-1.27
  8. Mel’nikov I. I., Mel’nikov I. I. Sudebnaya rech’ [Court speech]. Moscow, PravoBuk, 2017. 528 p. (in Russian).
  9. Rozina R. I. The coryphaeus of propaganda, or Stalin’s rhetoric. Russian Speech, 2021, no. 3, pp. 91–103 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.31857/S013161170015456-0
  10. Sergeich P. Iskusstvo rechi na sude [The art of speech in court]. Moscow, Yurayt, 2014. 395 p. (in Russian).
  11. The Criminal Procedure Code of the RSFSR of May 25, 1922. Fund of legal and regulatory-technical documents. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901757376 (accessed January 23, 2024) (in Russian).
  12. Tomsinov V. A. Prokuror SSSR A. Ya. Vyshinskiy i fenomen “stalinskikh repressiy”: itogovyye razmyshleniya i vyvody [USSR Prosecutor A. Ya. Vyshinsky and the phenomenon of “Stalinist repressions”: final thoughts and conclusions]. Available at: http://tomsinov.com/russia_contemp/tomsinov_v.a-prokuror_sssr_a.ja-vyshi... (accessed May 15, 2024) (in Russian).
  13. Tsitseron. Ob oratorskom iskusstve: traktaty [On the art of oratory: Treatises]. Saint Petersburg, Azbuka, Azbuka-Attikus, 2021. 496 p. (in Russian).
  14. Ugolovno-protsessual’nyy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 18.12.2001 № 174-FZ (red. ot 29.12.2022) (s izm. i dop., vstup. v silu s 11.01.2023) [The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation of 18.12.2001 No. 174-FZ (as amended on 29.12.2022) (with amendments and additions, effective from 11.01.2023)]. Available at: https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901757376 (accessed January 30, 2023) (in Russian).
  15. Volkov A. A. Osnovy ritoriki: uchebnoye posobiye dlya vuzov [Fundamentals of rhetoric: A textbook for universities]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy Proekt, 2003. 304 p. (in Russian).
  16. Vyshinskiy A. Ya. Sudebnyye rechi [Court speeches]. Moscow, Gosyurizdat, 1955. 358 p. (in Russian).
  17. Yuridicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’. Pod red. A. V. Mal’ko [Mal’ko A. V., ed. Legal encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Prospekt, 2017. 1136 p. (in Russian).
  18. Zemlyakova N. V., Garbovskaya N. B. Figurative language in the speeches of court speakers as one of the techniques of effective communication. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2018, no. 6 (124), pp. 95–99 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.24158/tipor.2018.6.21.
  19. Zrelova M. V. Linguistic means of expressing argumentation in judicial discourse at the end of the 20th century (based on the speech of the prosecutor in F. M. Dostoevsky’s novel “The Brothers Karamazov”). Slovo. Ru: Baltic Accent, 2018, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 86–93 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2018-1-7
Received: 
22.06.2024
Accepted: 
30.08.2024
Published: 
31.08.2026