International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Shchipitsina L. Y. Web Lecture as an Oral Internet Genre. Speech Genres, 2019, no. 3(23), pp. 215-226. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2019-3-23-215-226

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 707)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
811.161.1’276:004.738.5
EDN: 
AITRAI

Web Lecture as an Oral Internet Genre

Autors: 
Shchipitsina Larisa Yurievna, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov
Abstract: 

This article is devoted to the analyses of web lecture as a new genre of the Internet communication with growing popularity. Investigations of oral Internet genres are at their beginning, which implies the actuality of linguistic view especially on this genre type at a moment. The aim of the analysis is the genre characteristics of web lecture according to my Internet genre model, which includes media, pragmatic, structural and stylistic genre features. The empirical material of the analysis includes randomly selected web lectures in Russian and English, sampled on well known MOOC-platforms (coursera.org, openedu.ru) or offered through Adobe Connect and Mywebinar.ru tools. Web lecture is defined as a monological synchronous multimodal presentation of academic topics to the online audience, which is done with the help of a special hard and software. The web lecture exists in its prototypic (synchronous) and peripheric types (asynchronous records of web lectures, stored on special platforms). The analyses of the web lectures allows to reveal genre features, which are common to all oral Internet genres: synchronous character with space distance, interactivity, multimodality.

Reference: 
  1. Avramova A. G. Elektronnyi diskurs v zerkale oppoziciyi “ustnyi”/“pis’mennyi” [Electronic discourse through the opposition “oral”/“written”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [The Herold of the Moscow State University], Ser. 19. Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2004, no. 3, pp. 119–126 (in Russian).
  2. Bittner J. Digitalität, Sprache, Kommunikation. Eine Untersuchung zur Medialität von digitalen Kommunikations-formen und Textsorten und deren varietätenlinguistischer Modellierung. Berlin, Erich Schmidt Verl., 2003. 324 p.
  3. Bomsdorf B. Adaptation of Learning Spaces : Supporting Ubiquitous Learning in Higher Distance Education. Mobile Computing and Ambient Intelligence : The Challenge of Multimedia : Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings 05181. Hagen, 2005. Available at,: http://drops.dagstuhl.de/opus/volltexte/2005/371/pdf/05181.BomsdorfBirgi... (accessed 20 March 2018) (in English).
  4. Crystal D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2001. 316 p.
  5. Elagina O. B., Shumilina I. V. Ispol’zovaniye tekhnologiyi vebinara dlya otrabotki professional’nykh kompetenciy na kursakh povysheniya kvalifikaciyi prepodavateley [Using a webinar technology for developing the professional competences on the professional proficiency courses]. Pedagogicheskiye i informacionnye tekhnologiyi v obrazovaniyi [Pedagogical and information technologies in education], 2014, no. 13, p. 2 (in Russian).
  6. Formanovskaya N. I. Rechevoye vzaimodeystviye : kommunikaciya i pragmatika [Speech interaction : communication and pragmatics]. Moscow, Ikar Publ., 2007. 480 p. (in Russian).
  7. Gaynutdinov R. G. Razvitiye lekcii kak formy organizaciyi obucheniya v vysshey shkole v usloviyakh informatizaciyi obrazovaniya [A lecture as a teaching form in high schools in the epoch of education informatization]. Kazanskiy pedagogicheskiy zhurnal [Kazan pedagogical journal], 2014, no. 2, vol. 103, pp. 157–163 (in Russian).
  8. Goroshko E. I. Lingvistika Interneta : formirovaniye disciplinarnoy paradigmy [Linguistics of the Internet : developing a scientific paradigm]. Zhanry i tipy teksta v nauchnom i mediynom diskurse [Genres and text types in scientific and media discourse]. Iss. 5. Oryol, Kartush Publ., 2007, pp. 223–237 (in Russian).
  9. Kalinina S. D. Vebinar kak forma elektronnogo obucheniya v vysshey shkole [Webinar as a teaching form in high schools]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy [The Herold of the Moscow State Institute for International Affairs], 2015, no. 2, vol. 41, pp. 291–295 (in Russian).
  10. Karasik V. I. Yazykovoy krug : lichnost’, koncepty, diskurs [Language Circle : Personality, concepts, discourse]. Moscow, Gnozis Publ., 2004. 390 p. (in Russian).
  11. Koch P., Oesterreicher W. Sprache der Nähe –Sprache der Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie und Sprachgeschichte. Romanistisches Jahrbuch, 1985, no. 36, pp. 15–43.
  12. Kondrashov P. E. Komp’uternyi diskurs : sociolingvisticheskiy aspekt [Computer-mediated discourse : a sociolinguistic approach]. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Krasnodar, 2004. 189 p. (in Russian).
  13. Mychka S. Yu., Shatalov M. A. Provedeniye onlain-lekciy (vebinarov) v ramkakh strategiyi innovacionnogo razvitiya obrazovaniya [Holding a web lecture according to the innovative development of education]. Elektronnoye obucheniye v nepreryvnom obrazovaniyi [Electronic teaching in lifelong learning], 2016, no. 1, vol. 3, pp. 1189–1193 (in Russian).
  14. Oleshkov M. Yu. Kommunikatvno-rechevyje strategiyi v institucional’nom diskurse [Communicative and speech strategies in the institutional discourse]. Vestnik Pyatigorskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta [The Herold of the Pyatigorsk State Linguistic University], 2006, no. 3, pp. 16–30 (in Russian).
  15. Orlikowski W. J., Yates J. Genre Systems : Structuring Interaction through Communicative Norms. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1998. Available at: http://ccs.mit.edu/papers/CCSWP205 (accessed 12 July 2018).
  16. Prokhorova S. N. Ispol’zovaniye Skaip-tekhnologiy v distancionnom obucheniyi [Using Scype-technology in a distance learning]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [The Herold of the Voronezh State University]. Ser. Questions of high education, 2014, no. 3, pp. 83–86 (in Russian).
  17. Shchipitsina L. Yu. Lingvisticheskoye prelomleniye tekhnicheskikh kharakteristik komp’uterno-oposredovannoy kommunikaciyi [Linguistic impact of computer-mediated communication’s technical features]. Vestnik Yaroslavskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [The Herold of the Yaroslavl’ State University]. Ser. Human Studies, 2010, no. 1, pp. 98–104 (in Russian).
  18. ShchipitsinaqL. Yu. Zhanry komp’uterno-oposredovannoy kommunikaciyi [Genres of the computer-mediated communication]. Arkhangelsk, Pomorskiy universitet, 2009. 238 p. (in Russian).
  19. Shmeleva T. V. Model’ rechevogo zhanra [The speech genre model]. Zhanry rechi : sb. nauch. st. [Speech genres : coll. of sci. art.]. Saratov, GosUNTs “Kolledzh”, 1997, pp. 88–98 (in Russian).
  20. Solomonik A. Logic of Sign Systems of Different Types (on Example of the Logic of Statement and Genres of Speech). Speech Genres, 2018, no. 1(17), pp. 6–20. DOI:10.18500/2311-0740-2018-1-17-6-20 (in Russian).
  21. Titova S. V., Talmo T. Sozdaniye modeli interaktivnoy lekciyi s pomoshch’u mobil’noy sistemy golosovaniya SRS [Developing an interactive lecture model with the help of a mobile SRS voting system]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [The Herold of the Moscow State University]. Ser. 19 : Linguistics and intercultural communication, 2015, no. 3, pp. 49–63 (in Russian).
  22. Trosheva T. B. Ustnaya rech’ [Oral speech]. In: Stilisticheskiy enciklopedicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [The Stylistic encyclopedic dictionary of Russian]. 2nded. Moscow, Flinta ; Nauka Publ., 2006, pp. 567–569 (in Russian).
Received: 
12.07.2018
Accepted: 
24.10.2018
Published: 
31.08.2019