International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Bots T. S. Violation of the cooperative principle as the manifestation of “communicative sabotage” speech genre. Speech Genres, 2021, no. 1(29), pp. 57-65. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2021-1-29-57-65

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 581)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
811.161.1?42+811.111(73)?42+929[Путин+Обама]
EDN: 
MLNSHV

Violation of the cooperative principle as the manifestation of “communicative sabotage” speech genre

Autors: 
Bots Tatyana Sergeevna, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The article studies the “communicative sabotage” speech genre as a possible way of reacting to criticism in the response utterances of the presidents of Russia and the USA, V. V. Putin and B. Obama. The internal genre tactics of communicative sabotage are considered in relation to Grice’s Cooperative Principles. Both approaches are perceived as complementary in relation to each other, which allows to get a holistic perception of deviations from norms of interpersonal communication. The fact that communicative sabotage belongs to indirect communication reflects the specifics of the presidential discourse, which consists in the need to avoid inconvenient topics and to veil information in public communication with journalists. The role of communicative sabotage in solving pragmatic tasks of the president’s communication, such as the struggle for power, allows to attribute it to agonal speech genres.

Reference: 
  1. Andreeva V. Iu. Strategii i taktiki kommunikativnogo sabotazha [Strategies and tactics of communicative sabotage]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Kursk, 2009. 22 p. (in Russian).
  2. Andreeva V. Iu. The speech genre of communicative sabotage. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2009, no. 2, pp. 30–32 (in Russian).
  3. Arutiunova N. D. Addressee factor. Izvestiia Akademii nauk SSSR. Seriia literatury i iazyka, 1981, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 356–367 (in Russian).
  4. Bol’shoi tolkovyi slovar’ russkogo iazyka, pod red. S. A. Kuznetsov [S. A. Kuznetsov, ed. Big explanatory dictionary of Russian language]. Saint Petersburg, Norint Publ., 2000. 1536 p. (in Russian).
  5. Chilton P., Schaffner C. Discourse and politics. In: T. A. van Dijk, ed. Discourse as social interaction. Discourse studies : Multidisciplinary introduction. Sage Publications, 1997, pp. 206–230.
  6. Clayman S., Heritage J. The news interview : journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002. 375 p.
  7. Dementyev V. V. Nepriamaia kommunikatsiia [Indirect communication]. Moscow, Gnosis Publ., 2006. 376 p. (in Russian).
  8. Grice H. P. Logic and Conversation. Novoe v zarubezhnoi lingvistike, 1985, iss. 16, pp. 217–237 (in Russian).
  9. Grice H. P. Logics and conversation. In: P. Cole and J. L. Morgan, eds. Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, Speech Acts. New York, Academic Press, 1975, pp. 41–58.
  10. Iarenchuk E. E. Kommunikativnyi sabotazh v interaktivno-analiticheskom diskurse (na materiale shou) [Communicative sabotage in interactive analytical discourse (based on the show material)]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Kursk, 2013. 19 p. (in Russian).
  11. Issers O. S. Kommunikativnye strategii i taktiki russkoi rechi [Communicative strategies and tactics in the Russian speech. 5th ed.]. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2008. 288 p. (in Russian).
  12. Issers O. S. What politicians say to please their people. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta, 1996, iss. 1, pp. 71– 74 (in Russian).
  13. Mikhal’skaya A. K. Osnovy ritoriki. Mysl’ i slovo [Basics of rhetoric. The thought and word]. Мoscow, Prosveshcheniye Publ., 1996. 460 p. (in Russian).
  14. Nikolaeva T. N. About “non-cooperative” principle and/or categories of sociolinguistic influence. In: Logicheskii analiz iazyka. Protivorechivost’ i anomal’nost’ teksta, otv. red. N. D. Arutyunova [N. D. Arutyunova, ed. Logical analysis of language ,: inconsistency and anomalous text]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1990, pp. 225–235 (in Russian).
  15. Popova I. S. Direct speech and citation as ways of transmitting someone else’s word in speech. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta, ser. Filologiia, 2009, no. 3, pp. 65–69 (in Russian).
  16. Sedov K. F. On the genre nature of the discursive thinking of the language personality. Zhanry rechi : sb. nauch. st. [Speech Genres : coll. sci. art]. Saratov, GosUNTs “Kolledzh” Publ., 1999, iss. 2, pp. 13–26 (in Russian).
  17. Sheygal E. I. Semiotika politicheskogo diskursa [Semiotics of political discourse]. Thesis Diss. Dr. Sci. (Philol.). Volgograd, 2000. 431 p. (in Russian).
  18. Slovar’ sochetaemosti slov russkogo iazyka, pod red. P. N. Denisova, V. V. Morkovkina [P. N. Denisov, V. V. Morkovkin, eds. Dictionary of Russian word combinations. 2nd ed.]. Moscow, Russkii yazuk Publ., 1983. 686 p. (in Russian).
Received: 
10.03.2020
Accepted: 
25.06.2020
Published: 
31.03.2021