International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)

For citation:

Myaksheva O. V. TO PLEASE AND TO GUESS AS THE COMPONENTS OF GENRE CHARACTERISTICS IN THE ESSAYS BY THE CONTEMPORARY SCHOOL STUDENTS. Speech Genres, 2018, no. 2(18), pp. 136-143. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2018-2-18-136-143

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 504)
Article type: 


Myaksheva Olga Viktorovna, Saratov State University

This paper is devoted to studying of the essays by the contemporary school students and is included in linguocultural area of linguistics. The analysis of works sent to the verbal proficiency contest has shown that the texts under study are strictly patterned according to the standards of school compositions. The reflection «I’m writing to win in the contest»(compare with the reflection of the authors of school compositions - «to pass the examination») disfigures the goals of an essay as a product, containing individual impressions, vivid and aphoristic, full of free creation. The most significant verbal feature of the contestants’ essays is the homogeneous series with the stylistic effect of gradation, reaching the unreasonable heights of communication. The desire to strengthen the emotionality of the created text with this figure of speech and the objective difficulties in search of a needed word have lead, for instance, to the situations when some components with the unreasonable meaning, embedded in a phrase, appeared in the homogeneous series. Officialese is frequent in students’ works. At the juncture between the evaluative, high vocabulary in the form of long homogeneous series, rhetoric questions, exclamations and officialese the ground for grammatical, speech, logical and stylistic mistakes is formed. The linguostylistic analysis of the essays also reveals the alarming phenomenon: young people do not havethe experience of using the wordsfrom the semantic field «morality”, they are not deeply felt, not «lived» by them.

  1. Alefirenko N. F. Rechevoizhanr, diskurs, kultura [Speech genre, discourse, culture]. Zhanryrechi [Speech Genres]. Saratov, 2007, pp. 44-54.
  2. Antologiia kontseptov [The anthology of concepts] / ed. by V. I. Karasik and I. A. Sternin. Volgograd, Paradigma, 2005, vol. 1, 348 p.
  3. Antologiia kontseptov [The anthology of concepts] / ed. by V. I. Karasik and I. A. Sternin. Volgograd, Paradigma, 2005, vol. 2, 356 p.
  4. Dementyev V. V. Aspekty problemy «zhanr i kultura» [Aspects of a problem “genre and culture”]. Zhanryrechi [Speech Genres]. Saratov, 2007, iss. 5. Jenre and culture, pp. 5-20.
  5. Guts E. N. Leontieva O. A. Zhanrovo-kompozitsionnyye osobennosti sochineniya EGE kak predmet ortologicheskogo issledovaniya [Genre and compositional features of the Unified State Examination composition as the subject of orthological investigation]. Zhanryrechi [Speech Genres]. Saratov, 2011, iss. 7. Genre and linguistic persona, pp. 210-217.
  6. Kolesov V.V. Russkaia mental'nost' v iazyke i tekste [Russian Mentality in Language and Text]. St. Petersburg, PeterburgskoeVostokovedenie Publ., 2007, 640 p.
  7. Myaksheva O. V. Aktivnaya leksika I semanticheskiye lakuny v leksikone sovremennogo shkolnika [Active vocabulary and semantic lacunae in contemporary school student’s lexicon]. Problemy rechevoi kommunicatsii [Issues of Speech Communcation]. Saratov, 2016, iss. 16, pp. 48-56.
  8. Sdobnova A. P. Leksikon shkolnika kak dinamicheskaya sistema [Lexicon of the contemporary school student: textbook]. Saratov, Saratov University Publ., 2015. 248 p.
  9. Sirotinina O.B. Chto meshaet effektivnosti sovremennoi kommunikatsii [What makes modern communication ineffective]. Ekologiya yazyka I kommunikativnaya praktika [Ecology of language and communicative practice: scientific network publications]. 2017, iss. 1, pp. 25-37.
  10. Sirotinina O.B. Lingvo-filosovskie razmyshleniya kak rezul'tat mnogoletnego monitoring rechi [Linguo-philosophical reflection as a result of long-term speech monitoring]. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Filologiya I zhurnalistika [Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Philology. Journalism], 2017. vol. 17., iss. 1.,pp. 5– 11.
  11. Sirotinina O.B. Russkij yazyk: sistema, uzus i sozdavaemye im iriski [The Russian language: system, usage and risks, produced by them]. Saratov: Saratov State University Publishing, 2013. 116 p.
  12. Skovorodnikov А.P., Kopnina G.А. Lingvoekologicheskaya problema leksiko-frazeologicheskih utrat i priobretenii v sovremennom russkom yazyke I yazykovom soznanii ego nositelei [Linguoecological problem of the lexico-phraseological losses and acquisitions in the modern Russian language and linguistic consciousness of the native speakers] Yazyk: poiski, fakty, gipotezy [Language: investigation, facts, hypotheses]. Moscow, LEKSRUS, 2016, pp. 132-152
  13. Stepanov Y. S. Konstanty: Slovar’ russkoi kultury. [Constants: Dictionary of Russian culture]. Moscow, Akademicheskii Proiekt, 2001, 990 p.
  14. Zaliznyak A.A., Levontina I.B., Shmelev A.D. Kluchevyie idei russkoi yazykovoi kartiny mira [Key Ideas of Russian Linguistic World-Image]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Culture, 2005, 544 p.