International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Karasik V. I. Subject plot symbolism in allegories (on the material of mediaeval Armenian fables) . Speech Genres, 2023, vol. 18, iss. 4 (40), pp. 365-374. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2023-18-4-40-365-374, EDN: BUXXJG

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 230)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
821.19-191.’04
EDN: 
BUXXJG

Subject plot symbolism in allegories (on the material of mediaeval Armenian fables)

Autors: 
Karasik Vladimir Ilyich, Pushkin State Russian language Institute
Abstract: 

The paper deals with edifications expressed in Armenian fables of the XII–XIII centuries. These narratives describe common situations of overcoming serious difficulties, interrelations between authorities and people, and paradoxical unpredictability of existence. Three main topics presented in the narratives have been analyzed – the attitudes to the world, to authorities and to human character. The general principles of the world-view comprise loyalty to one’s own people, understanding the connection of cause and consequence, and emphasizing responsibility of one’s actions. The attitude to authorities is mainly critical. The fables show that power makes people cruel, but sober-minded shrewd people may win or at least remain alive. In times of war people should put aside their criticism and defend their country. The narratives about human nature describe envy and stupidity, and victims of fraud are not given sympathy to. The main inferences of the mediaeval Armenian fables may be summarized as fundamental ethical and utilitarian prescriptions of behavior – a realistic evaluation of complicated situations, impermissibility of credulousness, rejection of futile attempts to change the world, and loyalty to the principles of estimable life. The content of the fables reflects universal observations as expressed in similar narratives of other cultures, but has a vivid originality which manifests itself in the appeal to survive in almost unbearable circumstances.

Acknowledgments: 
This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 22-18-00339 entitled “Electronic resource “Armenian text of Russian poetry” representation of local text in Russian literature”).
Reference: 
  1. Abushenko V. L. Axiology. In: Vsemirnaya entsiklopediya: Filosofiya XX vek. Pod red. A. A. Gritsanova [Gritsanov A. A., ed. The World Encyclopedia: Philosophy XX century]. Moscow, AST, Minsk, Harvest, Sovremennyj literator, 2002, pp. 21–23 (in Russian).
  2. Averintsev S. S. Parable. In: Kratkaya literaturnaya entsiklopediya. T. 6 [Concise Literary Encyclopedia. Vol. 6]. Moscow, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 1964, pp. 20–21 (in Russian).
  3. Averintsev S. S. Symbol. In: Filosofskij entsiklopedicheskij slovar’ [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 1983, pp. 607–608 (in Russian).
  4. Barlyaeva E. A. Symbolic meanings in English Language and Culture. Thesis Diss. Dr. Sci. (Philol.). Saint Petersburg, 2012. 40 p. (in Russian).
  5. Bitarova M. M. Formastion and development of the genre “parable” in Ossetian literature. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Vladikavkaz, 2010. 22 p. (in Russian).
  6. Danilova T. V. Archetype roots of a parable. In: Ratsional’nost’ i semiotika diskursa [Rationality and Semiotics of Discourse]. Kiev, Naukova dumka, 1994, pp. 59–73 (in Russian).
  7. Dementyev V. V. Kommunikativnye tsennosti russkoj kul’tury: kategoriya personal’nosti v leksike i pragmatike [Communicative values of the Russian Culture: The category of Personality in Lexis and Pragmatics]. Moscow, Global Com, 2013. 336 p. (in Russian).
  8. Grass E. P. Allegoric meaning in everyday, artistic and religious types of discourse. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Volgograd, 2012. 22 p. (in Russian).
  9. Gubman B. L. Values. In: Kul’turologiya. XX vek. Entsiklopediya. T. 2 [Culturology. XX Century. Encyclopedia. Vol. 2]. Saint Petersburg, Universitetskaya kniga, 1998, pp. 342–343 (in Russian).
  10. Holmatov Sh. K. History and Poetics of the genre fable in the literature of the peoples of Middle Asia. Thesis Diss. Dr. Sci. (Philol.). Tashkent, 1991. 48 p. (in Russian).
  11. Kagan M. S. Filosofskaya teoriya tsennosti [A Philosophical Theory of Value]. Saint Petersburg, Petropolis, 1997. 205 p. (in Russian).
  12. Kushnareva L. I. Parable as a genre. In: Yazyk. Etnos. Soznanie: materialy mezhdunar. nauch. konf. : v 2 t. Gl. red. S. K. Bedanokova [Bedanokova S. K., ch. ed. Language Ethnicity. Consciousness: Materials of International scientific conference : in 2 vols.]. Majkop, Adyghe State University Publ., 2003, vol. 2, pp. 205–208 (in Russian).
  13. Losev A. F. Problema simvola i realisticheskoe iskusstvo [The Problem of Symbol and Realistic Art]. Moscow, Iskusstvo, 1995. 320 p. (in Russian).
  14. Lotman Yu. M. Between an emblem and a symbol. In: Lotmanovskij sbornik. T. 2. Sost. E. V. Permyakov [Permyakov E. V., comp. Lotman Collection of Articles. Vol. 2]. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities Publ., 1997, pp. 416–423 (in Russian).
  15. Mihajlova M. Symbol, allegory, parable: Approaching artistic cognition of the world. Znamya [Banner], 1966, no. 11, pp. 213–229 (in Russian).
  16. Mikeshina L. A. A modern development of the notion “value”. Values and Meanings, 2009, no. 1, pp. 6–17 (in Russian).
  17. Mikova S. S. Linguistic means of expression of cultural information in the text of Russian parable: A diachronic aspect of investigation. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2011. 16 p. (in Russian).
  18. Muskhelishvili N. L., Shrejder Yu. A. Parable as an instrument of initiation of a living knowledge. Philosophical Sciences, 1989, no. 9, pp. 101–104 (in Russian).
  19. Peng Wengzhao. Simvoly teksta i tekst simvola – o postroenii i interpretatsii simvoliki hudozhestvennogo teksta: monografiya [Symbols of text and a text of symbol – on composition and interpretation of the artistic text symbolism]. Moscow, MAKS Press, 2016. 120 p. (in Russian).
  20. Pikhtovnikova L. S. Parable as a genre and a text type: The problem of definition. New Philology, 2011, no. 2 (11), pp. 216–224 (in Russian).
  21. Poluyanova L. N. Linguostylistic peculiarities of the text of parable (on the material of English literary parable). Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2001. 24 p. (in Russian).
  22. Prorokov M. V. A category of artistic image and a problem of symbol. Journal of Moscow University. Ser. 9. Filologiya, 1987, no. 4, pp. 39–47 (in Russian).
  23. Radionova S. A. Symbol. In: Vsemirnaya entsiklopediya: Filosofiya XX vek [The World Encyclopedia. XX century]. Moscow, AST, Minsk, Harvest, Sovremennyj literator, 2002, pp. 674–675 (in Russian).
  24. Rokeach M. The Nature of Human Values. New York, The Free Press, 1973. 438 p.
  25. Rudov M. A. Directions of the development of a genre “parable” in the Soviet literature Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Alma-Ata, 1964. 23 p. (in Russian).
  26. Schwartz S. H. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1992, vol. 25, pp. 1–65.
  27. Shejkin A. G. Symbol. In: Kul’turologiya. Entsiklopediya : v 2 t. [Culturology. Encyclopedia : in 2 vols. Vol. 2]. Moscow, ROSSPEN, 2007, pp. 457–458 (in Russian).
  28. Shelestyuk E. V. Semantics of artistic image and symbol (on the material of English poetry of the XX century). Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 1998. 24 p. (in Russian).
  29. Slyshkin G. G. Ot teksta k simvolu: lingvokul’turnye kontsepty pretsedentnykh tekstov v soznanii i diskurse [From a text to a symbol: Linguistic and cultural concepts of precedent texts in consciousness and discourse]. Moscow, Academia, 2000. 128 p. (in Russian).
  30. Tovstenko O. O. Specificity of a parable as a genre of artistic creativity: A parable as an archetype form of literature. Journal of Kiev University: Romaic and Germanic Philology, 1989, no. 23, pp. 121–124 (in Russian).
  31. Tumina L. E. Pritcha kak shkola krasnorechiya: uchebnoe posobie [Parable as a school of Rhetoric: A manual]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo LKI, 2008. 368 p. (in Russian).
  32. Tyupa V. I. Facets and borders of parable. In: Traditsiya i literaturnyj protsess. Otv. red. A. B. Sortiev [Sortiev A. B., ch. ed. Tradition and Literary Process]. Novosibirsk, Sibir Section of Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 1999, pp. 381–387 (in Russian).
  33. Vorkachev S. G. Voploshchenie smysla: conceptualia selecta : monografiya [Implementation of Meaning: Conceptualia Selecta : A Monograph]. Volgograd, Paradigma, 2014. 331 p. (in Russian).
  34. Zinchenko V. P. Values in the structure of consciousness. Journal of Philosophy, 2011, no. 8, pp. 85–97 (in Russian).
Received: 
08.12.2022
Accepted: 
03.02.2023
Published: 
30.11.2023