International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)

For citation:

Steksova T. I. Speech genres of negative reaction. Speech Genres, 2023, vol. 18, iss. 3 (39), pp. 219-228. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2023-18-3-39-219-228, EDN: JETSCK

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 283)
Article type: 

Speech genres of negative reaction

Steksova Tatiana Ivanovna, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University

The article presents a study of a group of speech genres, where the factor of the past is relevant, i.e. which are reaction genres. The relevance of the research is determined by the need for the next step in the study of speech genres: from the description of specific genres to the identification and description of systemic relationships between them. The study is a genre analysis of the statements of the Russian language, recorded in the Corpus of the National Russian Language. The article identifies subgroups of genres of negative reaction in relation to the type of initial remark: reactions to imperative genres, reactions to informative genres and a group of genres, which can be caused by both initial remarks and facts of reality. In the course of the research, it was found out that groups of genres united according to the characteristics of the initial remark break up into other groups in case negative reaction genres are grouped according to their illocutionary purpose. Thus, it can be argued that in the genre system of Russian discourse one can see relations similar to paradigmatic and syntagmatic relations in the language system. Each genre, according to different genre-forming features, is associated with different groups of other genres. The approach proposed in the article allows to see those features of the speech genre that are not obvious in its isolated characterization.

  1. Andreeva V. Yu. Speech genre of communicative sabotage. Tomsk State University Journal of Philology, 2009, no. 2, pp. 30–32. (in Russian).
  2. Arkhipova E. V. Features of functioning of the speech act of consent / disagreement in different types of communication episodes. Questions of Psycholinguistics, 2012, no. 16, pp. 198–207 (in Russian).
  3. Borger Ya. V. Complex analysis of speech acts of negative reaction (on the material of modern dramatic works). Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Tyumen, 2004. 21 p. (in Russian).
  4. Bots T. S. Violation of the principle of cooperation as a manifestation of the genre of “communicative sabotage”. Speech Genres, 2021, no. 1 (29), pp. 57–65 (in Russian).
  5. Churikov M. P. Consent, disagreement and evasion in the aspect of verbal communication (based on the texts of German political interviews). Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Pyatigorsk, 2005. 17 p. (in Russian).
  6. Galaktionova I. V. Means of expressing consent / disagreement in Russian. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 1995. 242 p. (in Russian).
  7. Gelyaeva A. I., Makitova T. T. Features of the representation of the category of agreement / disagreement in the discourse of a scientific monograph. Actual Problems of Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 2020, no. 1, pp. 40–50 (in Russian).
  8. Knorts O. V. “Objection” in the circle of related speech genres: integral, differential features and features of functioning. Bulletin of the Siberian State University of Communications: Humanitarian Studies, 2019, no. 1 (5), pp. 71–76 (in Russian).
  9. Krainova A. S. Lingvopragmaticheskii? aspekt rechevogo obshcheniya (reche-povedencheskiye taktiki soglasiye i nesoglasiye) [Linguistic and pragmatic aspect of speech communication (speech-behavioral tactics of agreement and disagreement). St. Petersburg, Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, 2012. 159 p. (in Russian).
  10. Krasnykh V. I. Expression of agreementdisagreement with the statement of the interlocutor. Russkiy yazyk za rubezhom [Russian Language Abroad], 1970, no. 1, pp. 28–31 (in Russian).
  11. Lavrent’eva E. V. Speech genres of accusation and justification in dialogic unity. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Novosibirsk, 2006. 261 p. (in Russian).
  12. Lekant P. A. Disagreement as one of the modal meanings of the statement. In: Semantika grammaticheskikh form i rechevykh konstruktsii: sb. nauch. tr. [Semantics of grammatical forms and speech constructions: coll. of arts. sci. tr.]. Moscow, MOPI, 1991, pp. 41–44 (in Russian).
  13. Maslova L. N. Expression of agreement / disagreement in oral scientific communication (gender aspect). Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow, 2007. 192 p. (in Russian).
  14. Morozova M. K. Intentional meanings of agreement and disagreement in Russian and German discourses of meetings and negotiations. Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Tambov, 2004. 21 p. (in Russian).
  15. Orazalinova K. A. Intentional concepts “agreementdisagreement” in the Tatar, Russian and English languages. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Tobolsk, 2012. 23 p. (in Russian).
  16. Ozarovskiy O. V. Consent-disagreement as a category of communicative syntax (in the grammar of the Russian language for foreigners). In: Problemy uchebnika russkogo yazyka kak inostrannogo. Sintaksis: sb. nauch. tr. Otv. red. V. I. Krasnykh [Krasnykh V. I., ed. Problems of the textbook of the Russian language as a foreign language. Syntax: Sat. scientific tr.]. Moscow, Russkii yazyk, 1980, pp. 109–120 (in Russian).
  17. Ponomarenko E. A., Chureeva O. A. Speech genres of accusation and reproach in the speech behavior of a doctor. Speech Genres, 2022, vol. 17, no. 1 (33), pp. 21– 27 (in Russian).
  18. Poroikova N. I. Functioning of the means of expressing consent-disagreement in the dialogue] Funktsional’nyi analiz grammaticheskikh kategorii i yedinits: sb. nauch. tr. [Functional analysis of grammatical categories and units: coll. of sci. arts]. Leningrad, RGPU im. Gertsena Publ., 1976, pp. 102–115 (in Russian).
  19. Searle J. R. Classification of speech acts. Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike [New in foreign linguistics], iss. 17. Moscow, Progress, 1986, pp. 151–194 (in Russian).
  20. Shmeleva T. V. Appeal. In: Kul’tura russkoy rechi. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’-spravochnik [Culture of Russian speech. Encyclopedic dictionary-reference book]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2003, pp. 71–72 (in Russian).
  21. Shmeleva T. V. Complaint. In: Kul’tura russkoy rechi. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’-spravochnik [Culture of Russian speech. Encyclopedic dictionary-reference book]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2003, pp. 182 (in Russian).
  22. Shmeleva T. V. Model of speech genre. Zhanry rechi : sb. nauch. st. [Speech Genres : coll. of sci. arts]. 1997, iss. 1, pp. 88–98 (in Russian).
  23. Sidorenko A. V. Prohibition in the system of speech and folklore genres. Speech Genres, 2020, no. 2 (26), pp. 100–109 (in Russian).
  24. Steksova T. I., Bobrova V. M. The situation of speech disagreement (semantic-structural aspect). Funktsional’nyy analiz znachimykh yazykovykh yedinits v paradigmatike i sintagmatike: mezhvuz. sb. nauch. tr. [Functional analysis of significant language units in paradigmatics and syntagmatics: internuniv. coll. of sci. arts]. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Pedagogical Institute, 1991, pp. 56–64 (in Russian).
  25. Steksova T. I. Reprimand. In: Kul’tura russkoy rechi. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’-spravochnik [Culture of Russian speech. Encyclopedic dictionary-reference book]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2003, pp. 494–495 (in Russian).
  26. Steksova T. I. Reproach. In: Kul’tura russkoy rechi. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’-spravochnik [Culture of Russian speech. Encyclopedic dictionary-reference book]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka, 2003, pp. 728–729 (in Russian).
  27. Sviridova T. M. The category of agreementdisagreement in Russian. Thesis Diss. Dr. Sci. (Philol.). Yelets, 2006. 35 p. (in Russian).