International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Galkina E. V., Krasnoshchekova S. V., Kozhevnikova E. V. Referential features of narrative genres in the process of language acquisition. Speech Genres, 2022, vol. 17, iss. 4 (36), pp. 311-318. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2022-17-4-36-311-318, EDN: BUMSBW

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 371)
Language: 
Russian
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
811.161.1’243
EDN: 
BUMSBW

Referential features of narrative genres in the process of language acquisition

Autors: 
Galkina Elena V., Pavlov Institute of Physiology Russian Academy of Sciences
Krasnoshchekova Sofia V., Institute for Linguistic Studies Russian Academy of Science
Kozhevnikova Elena Valerievna , Pavlov Institute of Physiology Russian Academy of Sciences
Abstract: 

The paper regards the process of the development of several features of the narrative speech genre in the discourse field of Russian culture while learning Russian as a second language. Referentiality in general linguistic sense is an area concerning naming of objects and characters by language means. In this paper we analyse the problems of the referential choice (what factors influence the speaker’s choice of a referential expression) and anaphora resolution (how the listener/reader binds an anaphoric pronoun to a coreferential noun phrase). The main goal of our paper is to study referential features of narratives produced by foreign students acquiring Russian as a second language (RSL), compared with adult Russian speakers and children acquiring Russian as a first language (RFL). Also, we describe referential mistakes made by RSL learners. The analysis of the data demonstrates that the main referential features (abilities to make the right referential choices, form anaphoric chains, etc.) are related to the age-specific cognitive development and do not depend on the native language. Both groups of adults show similar patterns in using nouns and pronouns for the introduction or reintroduction of a referent and for the topic maintenance, and build continuous anaphoric chains. Particular anaphoric mistakes of RSL learners are related to the level of their grammar skills and differ from the mistakes made by RFL children: while children’s mistakes base on the cognitive factor, RSL students’ mistakes are mostly grammatical.

Reference: 
  1. Aksu-Koç A., Nicolopoulou A. Character reference in young children’s narratives: A crosslinguistic comparison of English, Greek, and Turkish. Lingua, 2015, no. 155, pp. 62–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.006
  2. Allen S., Hughes M. E., Skarabela B. The role of cognitive accessibility in children’s referential choice. In: The Acquisition of Reference. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2015, pp. 123–154. https://doi.org/10.1075/tilar.15.06all
  3. Bakhtin M. M. Problema rechevykh zhanrov. Yestetika slovesnogo tvorchestva [The problem of speech genres. Aesthetics of verbal creativity]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1979. 445 p. (in Russian).
  4. Banfiyeld A. Narrative style and the grammar of direct and indirect speech. Foundations of Language, 1973, vol. X, pp. 1–39.
  5. Bergelson M. B. Sotsiokulturnaya motivirovannost narrativov [Sociocultural motivation of narratives]. Available at: https://www.dialog- 21.ru/dialog2007/materials/html/06.htm (accessed 24 July 2021) (in Russian).
  6. Dementyev V. V. Nepryamaya kommunikatsiya i yeye zhanry [Indirect communication and its genres]. Saratov, Izd-vo Sarat. un-ta, 2000. 248 p. (in Russian).
  7. Flavell J. H. Theory-of-mind development Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quartely, 2004, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 274–290.
  8. Gagarina N., Klop D., Kunnari S., Tantele K., Välimaa T., Balčiūniyenė I., Bohnacker U., Walters J. Assessment of Narrative Abilitiyes in Bilingual Children. Assessing Multilingual Children. In: Disentangling Bilingualism from Language Impairment. Bristol, Buffalo, Toronto, Multilingual Matters., 2015, pp. 243–276. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783093137
  9. Gayda S. Conversational genres. Speech Genres, 1999, no. 2, pp. 103–111 (in Russian).
  10. Givon T., ed. Conversation. Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspectives. Typological Studiyes in Language. Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1997. 302 p.
  11. Gruyening A. Referential Choice and Activation Factors: A Neural Network Approach. Proceedings of the 4th Discourse anaphora and anaphor resolution colloquium. Lisbon, Edições Colibri, 2002, pp. 81–86.
  12. Haude K., Witzlack-Makarevich A. Referential hiyerarchiyes and alignment: An overviyew. Linguistics, 2016, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling2016-0008
  13. Kositskaya F. L. Speech genre as a unit of contrastive analysis. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2006, no. 4 (55), pp. 101–105 (in Russian).
  14. Lindgren J., Vogels J. Referential cohesion in Swedish preschool children’s narratives. Journal of Pragmatics, 2018, no. 133, pp. 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.007
  15. Nikolayeva T. M. Linguistics of the text: Current state and prospects. Novoye v zarubezhnoy lingvistike. Vyp. VIII [New in the Foreign Linguistics, iss. VIII]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1978, pp. 5–39 (in Russian).
  16. Nikolayeva T. M. Ot zvuka k tekstu [From sound to text]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul’tury Publ., 2000. 680 p. (in Russian).
  17. Onipenko N. K. Ontolinguistic grammar of the text. Scientific Journal of Herzen University, 2018, no. 189, pp. 169–178 (in Russian).
  18. Paducheva E. V. Semanticheskiye issledovaniya. Semantika vremeni i vida v russkom yazyke. Semantika narrative [Semantic research. Semantics of Time and View in Russian. Narrative semantics]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoi kul’tury Publ., 1996. 479 p. (in Russian).
  19. Pine J. M. The functional basis of referentiality: Evidence from children’s spontaneous speech. First Language, 1992, no. 12, pp. 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/014272379201203403
  20. Prince G. A Dictionary of Narratology. Nebraska, University of Nebraska Press, 2003. 126 p.
  21. Prokopenya V. K. The mechanisms of anaphora in speech production and comprehension: An experimental study based on the material of the Russian language. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Saint Petersburg, 2016. 27 p. (in Russian).
  22. Slabakova R., White L. Brambatti Guzzo N. Pronoun Interpretation in the Second Language: Yeffects of Computational Complexity. Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, no. 8, pp. 12–36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01236
Received: 
28.07.2021
Accepted: 
10.10.2021
Published: 
30.11.2022