International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Elina E. G., Pavlenko R. I. Definitions of genre in modern readers’ literary criticism. Speech Genres, 2024, vol. 19, iss. 2 (42), pp. 125-134. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2024-19-2-42-125-134, EDN: SBDBLV

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 123)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
821.161.1.09:004.738.5
EDN: 
SBDBLV

Definitions of genre in modern readers’ literary criticism

Autors: 
Elina Elena Genrihovna, Saratov State University
Pavlenko Roman Igorevich, Saratov State University
Abstract: 

The article studies definitions of genre that exist in mass readers’ minds and appear in their book reviews. While readers’ literary criticism and other forms of online-communication per se are now beginning to draw scientific interest, the problem of genre in fiction book reviews written by readers has been underinvestigated. Non-professional literary critics have a rather vague idea of literary genres that often lacks logic and does not comply with traditional hierarchy of genres. Readers try to fit the text they have read into a genre system they understand, but if it does not fit they create or coin a new genre definition that reflects their own understanding of the text, how they define its subject matter and what the text made them think about. In the minds of novice readers genre definition is closely related to the plot and their personal opinion of the book. Genre criteria analysis is often overlooked or seems arbitrary, oftentimes readers use the first genre definition that comes to their minds, i.e. a socially-agreed-upon definition, a convenient definition, a general definition, or a definition that has been widely used lately (for example, in the movie or book advertisements). Using their own reading experience, reviewers create their own reader’s glossary, in which literary movement is intertwined with their own estimation of the book quality, stylistic devices are mixed up with the author’s individual writing style, and reader’s emotional response becomes a genre criterion. 

Reference: 
  1. Beletskii A. I. On one of the latest tasks of historical and literary science: The study of the history of the reader. In: Beletskii A. I. Selected works on the theory of literature. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1964, pp. 112–127 (in Russian).
  2. Beliaeva N. E. Reading fiction in the Internet: Modern reader’s practices studying. Culture and Arts Herald, 2017, no. 2 (50), pp. 47–52 (in Russian).
  3. Burke T. The Digital Critic: Literary Culture Online. Available at: https://minorliteratures.com/2017/11/29/ the-digital-critic-literary-culture-online-tristan-burke/ (accessed August 31, 2023).
  4. Danilenko N., Saveleva T. Litres Reader Book Review: Non-Institutional Critique On The Internet. Journalistic text in a new technological environment: Achievements and problems, 2019, vol. 66. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences, pp. 719–727. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.08.02.85
  5. Gerasimova A. V. The process of reading in the Internet as a special way of reading. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 2018, no. 1, pp. 222–234 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.1.11
  6. Govorukhina Y. A., Dmitrieva Y. N. Literary forecast genre in modern criticism. Speech Genres, 2021, no. 2 (30), pp. 136–143 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2021-2-30-136-143
  7. Istoriia russkoi literaturnoi kritiki. Pod red. V. V. Prozorova. 2-e izd., ispr. [Prozorov V. V., ed. History of Russian literary criticism. 2nd edition, revised]. Moscow, Academy, 2009, pp. 9–14 (in Russian).
  8. Kaur K., Singh T. Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Amazon Books Sales: Empirical Evidence from India. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Research, 2021, no. 16, pp. 2793–2807. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer16070153
  9. Kiselev V. S. What to read, or the debris of canon: The classics in commercial electronic libraries of runet. Tekst. Kniga. Knigoizdaniye – Text. Book. Publishing, 2016, no. 3 (12), pp. 57–76 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.17223/23062061/12/5
  10. Kolokoltseva T. N. Dialogism in the genres of internet communication (chat, forum, blog). Speech Genres, 2016, no. 2, pp. 96–104 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/2311-0740-2016-2-14-96-104
  11. Kornev S. “Online Literature” and the End of the Postmodern Era: The Internet as a Habitat for Literature. New Literary Review, 1998, no. 32, pp. 29–47 (in Russian).
  12. Kovtun E. N. Fiction as an object of scientific research: Problems and prospects of domestic science fiction. In: Russian fantasy at the crossroads of eras and cultures: materials of the Intern. sci. conf., Moscow, March 21–23, 2006. Moscow, Moscow University Press, 2007, pp. 20–38 (in Russian).
  13. Livingstone J. “Cat Person” and the New Universe of Literary Criticism. Available at: https://newrepublic.com/article/146217/cat-person-new-universe-literary-... (accessed August 30, 2023).
  14. Marinova E. V. Network communication and its genres as objects of artistic representation (based on Russian literature). Speech Genres, 2021, no. 3 (31), pp. 216–225 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/23110740-2021-3-31-216-225
  15. Matveev M. Yu. Reader criticism on the Internet: Problems and controversies. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture, 2023, no. 2 (55) June, pp. 161– 170 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-20232-161-170
  16. Medvedev S. A. Several tendencies of relations development between authors and readers in the Internet review. Philology and human, 2015, no. 1, pp. 124–130.
  17. Mosunova L. A. Aesthetic assessments in readers’ reviews of modern literature. Bulletin of the Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts, 2022, no. 3 (45), pp. 85–92 (in Russian).
  18. Prozorov V. V. Chitatel’ i literaturnyi protsess [Reader and literary process]. Saratov, Saratov State University Publ., 1975. 211 p. (in Russian).
  19. Reitblat A. I. Ot Bovy k Bal’montu: Ocherki po istorii chteniia v Rossii vo vtoroi polovine XIX veka [From Bova to Balmont: Essays on the history of reading in Russia in the second half of the 19th century]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo MPI, 1991. 221 p. (in Russian).
  20. Rubakin N. A. Kak i s kakoi tsel’iu chitat’ knigi [How to read books and why]. Petersburg, Moscow, Kooperativnoe izdatel’stvo, 1922. 62 p. (in Russian).
  21. Rubakin N. A. Pis’ma k chitateliam o samoobrazovanii: kak nachinaiushchie chitateli dolzhny pristupat’ k nemu i kak vesti ego: tseli i sposoby samoobrazovatel’noi raboty. 3-e izd., peresm. i dop. [Letters to readers on self-education: How novice readers should start reading and to to proceed with it: Purposes and methods of selfeducation work. 3rd edition, reviewed and revised]. New York, A group of Russian workers-readers in New York, 1923. 382 p. (in Russian).
  22. Saveleva T. V. Reader’s review as a way of selfexpression in the media space. Znak: problemnoe pole mediaobrazovanija, 2022, no.1 (43), pp. 44–52 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.47475/2070-0695-2022-10105
  23. Stanková M. Online Literary Criticism: When Reader Becomes Critic. Available at: https:/ / www.researchgate.net/publication/352212953_Online_Literary_Criticism_Whe... (accessed August 30, 2023).
  24. Teoriia literaturnykh zhanrov: uchebnoe posobie dlia studentov uchrezhdenii vysshego professional’nogo obrazovaniia. Pod red. N. D. Tamarchenko [Tamarchenko N. D., ed. Theory of literary genres: A textbook for students of institutions of higher professional education]. Moscow, Akademia, 2011. 253 p. (in Russian).
  25. Tishkov A. A. Writer – Reader – Critic on the Internet. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philology. Journalism, 2012, vol. 12, iss. 3, pp. 99–106 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.18500/1817-7115-2012-12-3-99-106
  26. Toporov A. Krest’iane o pisateliakh. Izd. 2-e, pererab. i dop. [Peasants on writers. 2nd revised edition]. Novosibirsk, Novosibirskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo, 1963. 259 p. (in Russian).
  27. Vadde A., Pressman J. Web 2.0 and Literary Criticism. Available at: https://post45.org/sections/contemporaries-essays/web-2-0-and-literary-c... (accessed August 31, 2023).
  28. Voloshinova T. Yu. Literary terminology in the reviews of readers of book recommendation services. Modern Pedagogical Education, 2022, no. 12, pp. 253–258 (in Russian).
  29. Zinova E. A. Tendencies towards modification and existing varieties of the literary work review genre. Modern Problems of the Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2011, no. 9, pp. 138–143 (in Russian).
Received: 
08.09.2023
Accepted: 
17.10.2023
Published: 
31.05.2024