International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)


For citation:

Ponomarenko E. A. The classification of speech genres used in the sphere of institutional (medical) discourse (on the based of works by Russian writers – doctors). Speech Genres, 2015, no. 1(11), pp. 117-121. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2015-1-11-117-121

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
(downloads: 74)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
821.161.1.09+929

The classification of speech genres used in the sphere of institutional (medical) discourse (on the based of works by Russian writers – doctors)

Autors: 
Ponomarenko Elena Alikovna, V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal university
Abstract: 

In the article the typological classification of speech genres used in the sphere of institutional (medical) discourse is first presented. In the article the applicability of concept “paradigms” in the medical discourse is substantiated. It is marked that paradigmal units stipulating paradigmatics of medical discourse can be subdivided into two types: 1) basic paradigms functioning in the common model of anamnesis, and 2) highly specialized patterns related to certain aspects of common paradigms. Based on the concept of disciplinary matrix, which is a set of paradigms and paradigmal relations in some scientific discipline, its leading role in patterning the model of institutional (medical) discourse is stated. It is marked that paradigmatics as a methodological basis of clinical discourse is revealed at a level of speech as well.

Reference: 
  1. Dementyev V.V. Theory of speech genres. [Teoriya rechevih zhanrov]. Moscow, 2010, pp. 155–156.
  2. Encyclopedic Medical Terminology dictionary. [Enciklopedicheskiy slovar medicinskih terminov]. V. 1. Moscow, 1982. p. 15.
  3. Great Medical Encyclopedia. [Bolshaya Medicinskaya Enciklopediya]. V. 1 – A – ANSA. Moscow, Akcionernoe Obschestvo “Sovetskaya Enciklopediya”, 1928. pp. 594–597.
  4. Karasik V.I. About types of discourse [O tipah discursa]. Yazikovaya lichnost: instituzionalny I personalny discurs - Language personality: institutional and personal discourse. Volgograd, 2000, pp.5-20.
  5. Kun. T. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. [Struktura nauchnih revoluciy]. Moscow, 2002, pp. 225– 234.
  6. Yorgensen M. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. [Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod]. Kharkov, 2008. p. 17.
Received: 
28.11.2014
Accepted: 
19.12.2014
Published: 
08.06.2015