International journal

Speech Genres

ISSN 2311-0759 (Online)
ISSN 2311-0740 (Print)

For citation:

Ermakova O. P. Functions of Consent and Disagreement in Friendly Chat (Psikhologo-Linguistic Notes). Speech Genres, 2018, no. 1(17), pp. 60-66. DOI: 10.18500/2311-0740-2018-1-17-60-66

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0).
Full text:
download
(downloads: 455)
Language: 
Russian
Heading: 
Studies of individual genres
Article type: 
Article
UDC: 
811.161.1.23
DOI: 
10.18500/2311-0740-2018-1-17-60-66
EDN: 
YVJHQU

Functions of Consent and Disagreement in Friendly Chat (Psikhologo-Linguistic Notes)

Autors: 
Ermakova Olga Pavlovna, Kaluga State University named after K.E.Tsiolkovski
Abstract: 

In article functions of consent and disagreement in natural easy communication are considered. In the center of attention of the author question: whether always the consent of the interlocutor with speaking is expected whether always it contains positive effect, and disagreement – negative? Material which is given by the author of article mainly within a consolation genre, shows that quite often consent has a minus sign, and disagreement – plus. Also some general features of consent and disagreement and also silence role in their expression are considered.

Key words: 
consent
disagreement
ironical reactions as type of consent and disagreement
indirect answers
consolation
silence
Reference: 
  1. Arutyunova N. D. Molchanie : Conteksty upotrebleniya [Silence : Use contexts]. In : Logicheskii analiz yazyka. Yazyr rechevyh dejstvii [Logical analysis of language. Language of speech actions]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1994. pp. 106–117 (in Russian).
  2. Bulygina T. V., Shmelyov A. D. Vozrazhenie pod vidom soglasiya [Objection under the guise of consent]. In: Oblik slova. Sbornik statei pamyaty D. N. Shmeleva [Shape of a word. Collection of articles of memory of D. N. Shmelyov.]. Moscow, RAN, In-t rus. yaz. im. V. V. Vinogradova, 1997, pp. 137–148 (in Russian).
  3. Dement’iev V. V. Nepryamaya kommunikaciya [Indirect communication], Moscow, Gnosis Publ., 2006. 376 p. (in Russian).
  4. Ermakova O. P. Popytka tipologii kosvennyh otvetov [Attempt of typology of indirect answers]. Russkii yazyk segodnya. Vyp. 5. Problemy rechevogo obsheniya [Russian today. Iss. 5. Problems of speech communication]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2012, pp. 156–169 (in Russian).
  5. Ermakova O. P., Zemskaya E. A. K postroeniyu tipologii kommunikativnykh neudach (na materiale estestvennogo russkogo dialoga) [To creation of typology of communicative failures (on material of natural Russian dialogue)]. In: Russkii yazyk segodnya. Kommunikativnopragmaticheskii aspect [Russian in its functioning. Communicative and pragmatical aspect]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1993, pp. 30–64 (in Russian).
  6. Fedosyuk M. Yu. Kompleksnye ghanry razgovornoj rech : “utverzdenie”, “ubezhdenie”, “ugovory” [Complex genres of informal conversation : “statement”, “belief” and “arrangements”]. In: Russkaya narodnaya rech kak yavlenie gorodskoj kul’tury [Russian informal conversation as phenomenon of city culture]. Yekaterinburg, Argo Publ., 1996, pp. 102–120 (in Russian).
  7. Kibrik A. A. Molchanie kak kommunikativnyi act [Silence as communicative act] In: Dejstvie : lingvisticheskie I logicheskie modeli [Action : linguistic and logical models : Theses of reports]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, pp. 49–56 (in Russian).
  8. Krysin L. P. Tolerantnost’ kak factor v rechevom obshenii [Tolerance as a factor in speech communication]. Russkii yazyk segodnya. Vyp. 5. Problemy rechevogo obsheniya [Russian today. Iss. 5. Problems of speech communication]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2012, pp. 253–259 (in Russian).
  9. Melikyan S. V. Rechevoj akt molchaniya v structure obsheniya [The speech act of silence in structure of communication]. Thesis Diss. Cand. Sci (Philol.). Voronezh, 2004. 20 p. (in Russian).
  10. Norman B. Yu. Molchanie kak sposob kommunikacii [Silence as a way of communication]. In: Kulturnye praktici tolerantnosti v rechevoj kommunikacii [Cultural practicians of tolerance in speech communication]. Yekaterinburg, 2004, pp. 231–243 (in Russian).
  11. Paducheva E. V. Problema kommunikativnoj neudachi v skazkah Lewis Carrolla [Problem of communicative failure in fairy tales by Lewis Carroll]. In: Tekst i Zdanie. Zbior studiow. Wrocіaw, Kraków, Gdaсsk, Lódz, 1983. pp. 139–160 (in Russian).
  12. Pocheptsov G. G. Molchanie kak znak [Silence as sign]. Nauchnye vedomosti. Ser. gumanitarnyh nauk [Scientific sheets. Ser. of the humanities]. 2010, no. 18, pp. 90–91 (in Russian).
  13. Shalina I. V. Uteshenie kak kommunikativnaya neudacha. Russkij yazyk segodnya. Vyp. 6. Rechevye ghanry sovremennogo obsheniya [Consolation as communicative failure. Russian today. Iss. 6. Speech genres of modern communication]. Moscow, Flinta, Nauka Publ., 2015. pp. 362–372 (in Russian).
Received: 
09.11.2017
Accepted: 
25.12.2017
Published: 
25.02.2018